Tag: Evolution 2019

Evolution 2019: On the Origin of Anolis Sex Chromosomes

The origin and maintenance of reproductive isolation between species is a central question to evolutionary biologists. Divergent sex chromosomes can play an important role in this process, and are generally assumed to have outsized importance in the establishment of reproductive barriers. Studying the origin and evolution of sex chromosomes – and their respective fusions and fissions – may therefore provide key insights into their role in these processes.

Anole are known to vary in sex chromosome size and content, although all anoles are male heterogametic. In a poster at Evolution, de Mello et al. investigate the neo-sex chromosomes of Anolis distichus, one of the “model anoles” of speciation research. Starting from a newly assembled genome, these researchers used differences in coverage, k-mer comparisons, and synteny mapping to the Anolis carolinensis genome, to identify the sex-linked genomic regions of A. distichus.

From these results, de Mello et al. were able to identify deep conservation of the X chromosome between A. distichus and A. carolinensis – implying an ancient origin of a shared anole X chromosome. They also identified explicitly Y-linked scaffolds for the first time in any Anolis species, which will prove useful for future work on the evolution of these sex chromosomes. However, perhaps most excitingly, de Mello et al. identified a chromosome fusion of the Anolis carolinensis microchromosomes 11 and 12 to the A. distichus X chromosome. In other words, the A. distichus  X chromosome has expanded through the fusion of these two microchromosomes.

de Mello et al.’s  result that the  A. distichus sex chromosomes are simultaneously ancient and newly expanding provides a fascinating look at the dynamic lives of these sex chromosomes. Future investigations into the evolution of Anolis sex chromosomes will surely prove fruitful to understanding their role in the diversification of the Anolis lineages.

Evolution 2019: How Do Anoles Handle Artificial Light at Night?

At the 2019 Evolution Meetings thus far, we’ve seen some excellent work on anoles’ interaction with, and adaptation to, our changing world. Vincent Farrallo gave a talk on modeling the (surprising) effects on climate change on anole species, and Bailey Howell presented a poster on how Anolis cristatellus‘ toepads differ in shape and size between urban and non-urban environments.

In Monday’s poster session, Chris Thawley, a postdoctoral fellow in Jason Kolbe’s lab at the University of Rhode Island who will be teaching at Davidson College in the fall, gave a great contribution to this body of presentations at the meeting. His poster, “Cities in the spotlight: Does tolerance of artificial light at night promote urban invasions?”, showed his detailed work on this “evolutionarily novel condition.” He predicted artificial light at night, or ALAN, would be a double-edged sword for anoles. On the one hand, it perturbs sleep and endocrine cycles, makes it easier to for predators to find an anole late-night snack, and may negatively impact reproduction. It might not necessarily be all negative, however, as it could make it easier for anoles to find food and mates and protect territories.

Chris found significant effects of ALAN on reproductive habits: anoles exposed to ALAN start to lay eggs earlier and lay more eggs than anoles facing natural lighting conditions. Further, ALAN increases anole growth! Interestingly enough, however, Chris found that anoles have no real preference between ALAN and natural lighting conditions, and don’t appear to be more or less stressed under ALAN. In addition to this work with live anoles, Chris searched the literature to see if there’s an overlap between anole species that are invasive and those that have been reported to take advantage of ALAN. There is indeed such an overlap — 7 species are invasive but aren’t known to use ALAN and 8 non-invasive species use ALAN, but there are 15 invasive ALAN-using anole species!

Chris’s next questions involve the effect of ALAN on other taxa, as well as whether urbanizing anole species have adaptations that make them predisposed to take advantage of ALAN and what the effects of plasticity are in doing so. Given the prevalence of artificial light at night, and our love of Anolis, it should prove really exciting to learn more about the interaction between the two!

Evolution 2019: Can Archival DNA Illuminate A. roosevelti’s Evolutionary History?

Resolving how extinct species are related to extant ones is often a challenge, as we may not possess the right information, especially genetic data, needed to understand how these species evolved from others. Recently, scientists have increasingly employed archival DNA, or DNA taken from preserved specimens such as those in natural history collections, to understand the evolution of extinct species, including the quagga and thylacine among others.

Thylacines (Thylacinus cynocephalus) in the National Zoo, Washington D.C. (Smithsonian Institute).

Fortunately, to our best knowledge, only one species of anole is suspected to have become extinct in historical times, Anolis roosevelti, the presumed crown giant anole of the eastern Puerto Rico Bank, where it was found on Vieques, Culebra, St. John, and Tortola. Something of a holy grail for anolologists, many researchers have done their best Indiana Jones and taken a crack at finding living A. roosevelti, including some truly heroic fieldwork.

Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, with the known distribution of Anolis
roosevelti (stars). From west to east: Vieques, Culebra, St. John, and Tortola. From Mayer and Gamble 2019.

Despite these efforts, no live individuals have been found. Only six specimens of A. roosevelti are known to exist and thus are precious records of this presumably lost species. Previous work has used quantitative characters to attempt to resolve the placement of A. roosevelti in the anole phylogeny, but genetic data is the gold standard for describing evolutionary relationships. Could archival DNA from these specimens, preserved at museums across the world, resolve how A. roosevelti is related to extant species?

MCZ 36138, the holotype of Anolis roosevelti. Laszlo Meszoly, del. From Mayer and Gamble 2019.

Greg Mayer at University of Wisconsin-Parkside and Tony Gamble at Marquette University have embarked on their own quest to answer this question. First, Greg tracked down all six known specimens of A. roosevelti. He determined that they have all been preserved in ethanol, rather than formalin, indicating a reasonable chance of obtaining DNA from these individuals. Because the roosevelti specimens are so precious, Greg and Tony worked to generate a proof of concept for the use of archival DNA sequencing on them. They extracted DNA from specimens of the common crested anole (Anolis cristatellus) preserved using the same methods by the same collectors and at the same times and general locations.

One of the six extant specimens of A. roosevelti (ZMUK 37642, Vieques, A.H. Riise; photo by Mogens Andersen).

They were able to successfully extract and sequence at least partial mitogenomes from 5 of 8 historical samples, including some preserved as far back as 1861! The sequences from these archival specimens clustered with those collected contemporaneously from similar localities. These results indicate that the sequencing of archival DNA provides quality data and that similar procedures are likely to be effective in A. roosevelti specimens.

Greg and Tony’s next step is to obtain tissue from these important specimens, sequence their mitogenomes, and add to our knowledge of this presumably extinct species. Stay tuned for their findings!

For more info, check out the article in Anolis Newsletter VII:

Mayer, G. C. and T. Gamble. 2019. Using archival DNA to elucidate anole phylogeny. Anolis Newsletter VII, p. 158-168. Eds. Stroud, J.T., Geneva, A.J., Losos, J.B. Washington University, St. Louis MO.

Evolution 2019: How Does Urbanization Affect Toepad Shape and Size in Anolis cristatellus?

Bailey Howell, a rising senior in Travis Hagey‘s lab at Mississippi University for Women, presented a poster at Evolution on differences in toepad morphology between urban and non-urban populations of Anolis cristatellus. The two of them coauthored the work with Kristin Winchell, who has been investigating morphological effects of urbanization in that species, and who captured A. cristatellus for the study. Bailey mapped their toepad landmarks and quantified a suite of toepad traits, including length and width, in a whopping 160 of them! She did this to investigate differences between individuals from urban and non-urban sites, with the goal of contributing to our understanding of the species’ adaptation to cities.

She ran some neat statistics for the project: first, a principal component analysis of all toepads scanned, which found differences in the degree to which urban and non-urban toepads are bent. She went one step further by running a canonical variate analysis to find which factors are maximally different between the urban and non-urban lizards. A scaled (pun unintended) figure from her poster of the theoretical most-urban and most-non-urban toepads is below (urban is in gray, non-urban is in green).

This CVA explained significant variation between the two populations, and accounted for 14.5% of the difference! Taking things a step further, Bailey analyzed size as well as shape from the traits she measured, and saw that urban toepads were wider, and, in particular, longer, than non-urban ones. Next steps for the project include adding more toepads to the dataset, analyzing the data in light of more (toepad and non-toepad) traits in these individuals, and looking for an effect on performance. It seems like they’re well on their way to understanding this important effect of urbanization in this species!

Evolution 2019: Morphologically Distinct Populations of Anolis sagrei Have No Issues Interbreeding

Emmanuel D’Agostino presenting his undergraduate research at Evolution 2019.

Emmanuel D’Agostino, a (recently graduated) undergraduate in the Losos lab at Harvard  presented his undergraduate thesis at Evolution 2019. Working with Colin Donihue, Anthony Geneva, and Jonathan Losos, Emmanuel analyzed genetics, morphology, and mating behavior of Anolis sagrei collected from across their Bahamian range. Anolis sagrei differ pretty drastically in ecomorphological and sexually selected traits on different islands throughout the Bahamas. Emmanuel wanted to find out if this differentiation created barriers to mating  among divergent populations on different islands.

Emmanuel analyzed an impressive 184 videos of recently paired males and females from different islands under laboratory conditions. (Emmanuel informs me that there were actually 234 videos but many he could not score because of uncooperative lizards hiding behind the planters and out of view of the camera – who knows what they did back there!). He then quantified latency to mate to see if individuals from different islands would mate freely and if willingness to mate was related to morphological differences. He combined his video analysis with genomic and morphological data to understand how genetically and morphologically distinct populations are.

Emmanuel found that individuals from different populations mate freely, suggesting no effect of premating isolation related to morphological disparity. He also analyzed a large number of linear models to tease apart the relative contributions of genetics and morphology and found that the most important predictor of mating success was relative head size – males with smaller head sizes correlated with increased likelihood of mating success! Intriguingly, in his final analysis he found that males that mated the quickest had decreased offspring survival rates. So even though smaller-headed males may mate more readily, their offspring are less likely to survive.

Evolution 2019: How Many Species of Anolis distichus?

Anolis distichus is a highly variable species from Hispaniola. It’s especially variable in its dewlap color, ranging from white, to orange, to red. In the past, A. distichus has been broken up into 16 subspecies based on its dewlap variation! Previous work by Rich Glor and his students used genetic data to identify six candidate species, although these six candidate species didn’t correspond well with the 16 dewlap-based subspecies.  In order to get a better handle on how justified these candidate species are, undergraduate Tanner Myers, working with Pietro Longo Hollanda de Mello and Rich Glor, from the University of Kansas, presented a poster titled Identifying species when boundaries are blurred.

Myers collected morphological data from populations of A. distichus from across Hispaniola. The authors expected their morphological data to also partition along with the previously identified genetic candidate species. They found this to not be the case!  When the authors looked at their morphological data (linear body, limb, and head measurements), to see if these 6 candidate species had any morphological divergence, they found no strong pattern. All of the candidate species clustered together to support one morphological group. In the end, the authors suggest that Anolis distichus may represent a highly variable group in in the early stages of speciation, but at this point, they do not support any taxonomic revisions of the species.

Tanner Myers will be starting graduate school with Jamie Oaks at Auburn University in the fall.

Evolution 2019: Coming Soon!

It seems hard to believe almost a year has passed since the last Evolution meeting. Last year we brought you coverage of the anole talks and posters in Montpelier, France. This year, we’re coming to you live from Providence, Rhode Island from June 22nd – 25th! This year there are eight talks and eight posters scheduled *(searching the schedule for keywords “anole” and “Anolis“). There’s some pretty fascinating topics on the schedule – here’s what you have to look forward to each day:

Saturday: 

  • Habitat use, competition, and phylogenetic history shape the evolution of claw morphology in Lesser Antillean anoles (Yuan, Jung, Wake, Wang)
  • Estimating premating isolation among allopatric Anolis sagrei populations (Poster board #152) (D’Agostino, Geneva, Donihue, Losos)
  • Morphological assessment reveals candidate species of Anolis lizards to be truly cryptic (Poster board #175) (Meyers, de Mello, Glor)

Sunday:

  • Mountaintop endemics and climate change: is warming always a problem? (Farallo, Muñoz)
  • Sexual signal diversity and population genetic structure in Amazonian anole lizards (Prates, D’Angiolella, Melo-Sampaio, Rodrigues, de Quieroz, Bell)
  • The effects of volcanic activity on the phylogeographic history of the Plymouth Anole, Anolis lividus, on Montserrat (Poster board #72) (Jung, Yuan, Wang, Frederick)
  • Identification and assembly of an anole sex-chromosome: Rapid degeneration since autosomal fusion? (Poster board #160) (de Mello, Hime, Glor)
  • Effects of urbanization on toe pad shape and lamellae size in Anolis cristatellus (Poster board #174) (Howell, Hagey, Winchell)

Monday: 

  • Using archival DNA to elucidate anole phylogeny (Mayer, Gamble)
  • Comparative landscape genetics and epigenetics of two trunk-ground anoles (Wang, Wogan, Yuan, Mahler)
  • Ancient hybridization in the adaptive radiation of Anolis lizards on Puerto Rico (Wogan, Yuan, Wang)
  • Urban adaptation in anole lizards of the Greater Antilles (Poster board #7) (Winchell)
  • Cities in the Spotlight: Does Tolerance of Artificial Light at Night Promote Urban Invasions? (Poster board #97) (Thawley, Kolbe)
  • Sex-specific mortality and senescence in a wild population of brown anole lizards (Poster board #102) (Reedy, Kahrl, Seears, Wittman, Bhave, Cox, Schwartz)
  • Adaptive radiation in the multidimensional phenotype (Bodensteiner, Muñoz)
  • Patterns of morphological diversity in Draconura clade anole lizards (Huie, Prates, Bell, de Quieroz)

 

Did we miss any? If so, let us know in the comments so we can be sure to add it to our schedules! We will be live blogging the meeting as usual, so check back starting June 22nd to hear about the latest in anole evolutionary research. And if you are attending the meeting, consider blogging a talk or poster for us (new contributors welcome!). Just send me an email and I will fill you in on all you need to know.

Page 2 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén