Anole Annals

Amy Yackel Adams presents at JMIH 2017.

All anole field biologists have been there, right? It’s the middle of the night, and you’re walking around the forest searching for sleeping lizards in the trees. You’re probably wearing a headlamp, so the bugs are flying around your face, and your eyes start to strain as you get sleepy and you’re entering hour three or four of the search. This searcher fatigue could lead to the kinds of unintentional bias that can interfere with our research. But there’s good news when it comes to anoles, as Amy Yackel Adams, a statistician with the USGS in Fort Collins, Colorado, reported on the last day of JMIH.

Dr. Yackel Adams works with a Rapid Response Team whose goal is to prevent the spread of the worst invasive species. When a report came in of a sighting of a brown tree snake on the island of Saipan (in the Northern Mariana Islands, western Pacific Ocean), the team of experienced herpers deployed to Saipan and began intensive nightly surveys to assess the possibility of a brown tree snake population there.  Luckily, they didn’t find any of these snakes in the surveys, but they did log 20,000+ sightings of other vertebrates! These included emerald tree skinks, several species of geckos, a variety of small mammals, and the green anole (Anolis carolinensis). Dr. Yackel Adams saw an opportunity to use this rich dataset to statistically test for two types of bias that could occur in such surveys – searcher fatigue (both across the 4-hour nightly searches, and across the up-to-31 day deployment), and searcher bias in taxon detection.

The team of 29 searchers covered a total of 387 km of transects during the 31 days, and found a total of 5,800 sleeping green anoles during this time. (Wow!!) In terms of short-term searcher fatigue, there was a slight decrease in tree skink and mammal sightings as the night progresses, and gecko sightings were generally stable over the night, but far MORE green anoles were sighted in the later hours of the night. And over the long term, skinks and anoles were MORE likely to be detected the more nights a searcher worked, and there was no evidence of long-term searcher fatigue.  So, that’s why my take-home message was “nobody gets tired of looking for anoles!”

There was, however, significant taxonomic bias among the searchers – for example, the skink-to-anole sighting ratios ranged from 0.86 to 9.5. Dr. Yackel Adams concluded that this type of bias could be a real problem for certain kinds of studies, and we should be aware that differences among sightings by our survey team members could be potentially problematic in statistical analyses.

Chris Thawley presents at JMIH 2017.

For most of the history of life on earth, the only sources of light at night were the moon and stars. Yet with the invention and rapid spread of electric light, species around the world now face a novel evolutionary pressure: artificial light at night, or ALAN. Artificial light likely has an especially strong effect on animals in city habitats, such as the urban-adapted brown anole lizard, Anolis sagrei. Chris Thawley and Jason Kolbe at the University of Rhode Island set out to determine whether brown anoles were negatively impacted by ALAN.

In addition to their abundance in urban environments, brown anoles are a particularly good species for this study.  Previous studies of brown anoles have shown that photoperiod influences the onset of reproduction at the beginning of the breeding season, and that several behavioral traits change under artificial light. In addition, work by Moore and Menaker has shown that pineal production of melatonin in this species is significantly altered by photoperiod.  So, would ALAN influence brown anole growth and reproduction?

Chris and Jason collected lizards from south Florida and set up a lab experiment where some lizards experienced a normal photoperiod, and others were exposed to ALAN that mimicked landscape lighting. Their results were quite unexpected! ALAN actually increased female growth, resulted in eggs laid earlier in the season, and increased the reproductive output of small females – but did not affect the number or mass of eggs or hatchlings.  And, ALAN females did not exhibit more stress (measured via circulating corticosterone) than control females.

So are brown anoles just superlizards? Do they have no trade-offs that result from ALAN? Chris suggested that it’s possible that such trade-offs may appear in studies over a longer time period, or in traits not measured here. Or, perhaps ad libitum food and the absence of predators in the lab remove the costs of ALAN. Or, maybe these really are indefatigable lizards!

Greetings from Austin, Texas, and the Joint Meeting of Ichthylogists and Herpetologists! Chris Thawley and I have appointed ourselves to be your AA reporting team from JMIH, and we’re aiming to post updates from each of the 8 anole talks and posters at this meeting.

Brian Folt

On the first day of the conference, there were two exciting talks on the ecology of Costa Rican anoles. The first was by Brian Folt, a graduate student in Craig Guyer’s lab at Auburn, who developed a model of predator-prey co-occurrence where one of the prey were anoles (Anolis (Norops) humilis) and the predators were…spiders?!  Yes, wandering spiders, or ctenids, can prey upon the small anoles on the forest floor. (The other putative prey were poison dart frogs, who have a relatively similar life history to anoles.) Brian performed an extensive field study in 14 plots at La Selva Biological Station, conducting visual encounter surveys for anoles, frogs, and spiders, and recording arthropods in leaf litter samples. He used two-species occupancy models to determine how prey were affected by the presence of the predator and by resource abundance in the leaf litter. The result? Anole occupancy was lower where spiders were absent, and the detection probability of anoles was higher when spiders were present and detected. This suggests that anoles are responding behaviorally, such that they may increase their vigilance when predators are around.

Michelle Thompson

I then ran across the conference center to catch the next anole talk – a terrific presentation by Michelle Thompson, a graduate student in Maureen Donnelly’s lab at Florida International University. Michelle studied whether thermal quality differed across the stages of forest succession, and how that affected Anolis (Norops) humilis and A. (N.) limifrons distributions. She worked across transects of pasture, secondary forest, and old growth forest in both upland and riparian sites. Michelle measured the thermal quality of each habitat, the thermal preferences of the lizards, and the location and abundance of the lizards. She found that thermal quality was lowest in the pasture sites, as temperatures were frequently higher than the lizards prefer. Yet, in these pasture sites, riparian habitat with remnant trees provided a thermal refuge for the lizards. This kind of work can help us understand why and how species may respond differently to human-caused alterations in habitat structure and temperature in our changing world.

Stay tuned for updates from JMIH, and follow the #JMIH17 hashtag on twitter for more herp-related news!