Concrete Escape: Increased Wariness of Anoles when Escaping from Cement Walls

 

Fig. 1. Anoles perched on various manmade surfaces 

Lizards in the city are everywhere! Often you see them on buildings, statues, benches and other objects (Fig 1). These manmade structures are very different from natural substrates and thus might affect their locomotor ability and escape responses. This observation led me to develop questions around how lizards respond to incoming threats when using these artificial structures. I am very grateful that I got to “get my feet wet” tackling some of these questions during my master’s degree as a member of the Kolbe Lab in the University of Rhode Island.

In our recent paper, we contrasted the escape response of Anolis cristatellus in forests versus cities, and within the latter, between lizards perched on natural versus manmade surfaces. We selected this question because we believed that the heterogeneity of habitat structure in the city might influence the decision-making of flight responses. When a predator approaches, an animal should flee when the costs of staying outweigh the energetic costs of fleeing. Consequently, we hypothesized that the cost of flight varies when the animal is perched on smooth surfaces. However, we expected that city lizards should have reduced flight responses largely influenced by habituation to humans.

The bad habits of habituation

One of the major hurdles involved designing our project to separate the component of behavioral adjustments to humans versus structural habitat differences when contrasting escape responses. The literature often has used the concept of habituation as a discussion point when contrasting flight responses of habitats that differ in human activity. Only a few studies have attempted to quantify how human activity might influence escape responses. We explored this concept by sampling lizards perched on trees at edges of a forest trail or sidewalk that were frequently visited by pedestrians and cyclers. Lizards perched closest to the trail or sidewalk should be more exposed to human activity and respond with reduced flight initiation distance. We found that forest lizards perched at the edge of the trail had shorter flight initiation distances (Fig. 2). Lizards perched 4m away from the trail had longer flight responses. In contrast, city lizards sampled at trees along a sidewalk showed no difference in flight response with increasing distance from the sidewalk. With this, we were able to show how habituation influenced escape responses, possibly driven by the degree lizards were able to see human activity. At 4m from the forest trail, we had very limited visibility of the trail. In contrast, in the sidewalk at 8m away from the sidewalk, we could see the sidewalk, the road and the sidewalk at the other side of the road. However, more work specifically directed to tackle the concept of habituation is needed to understand its role in facilitating the successful colonization of urban habitats.

Fig. 2. Log flight initiation distance of lizards sampled with increasing distance away from a trail in the forest or a sidewalk in the city.

The wall

City lizards were abundantly using cement and metal structures. For this reason, we compared escape responses of forest lizards on trees to city lizards on cement, metal and trees. Most of the cement structures were large buildings, whereas metal often included fence posts and light fixtures. Both metal and cement are smoother than bark and greatly reduce stability during locomotion. When lizards run vertically on smooth surfaces, they are more likely to slip and fall. We hypothesized that such locomotor constraints should increase the cost of flight and thus lizards on manmade surfaces should have longer flight initiation distances. We found that forest lizards had the longest flight initiation distance (Fig 3). Surprisingly, we found that there was no difference in flight response between city lizards perched on trees and those on metal posts. Metal perches were often cylindrical and lizards could circle around the perch, breaking away from the line of sight. In contrast, cement walls were often long and required lizards to either slowly move up and out of reach or sprint longer distances to circle towards the next connecting wall. The ability to quickly hide with a short burst of movement decreased the cost of flight on metal posts.

Fig. 3. Flight initiation distance of forest anoles perch on trees and urban anoles perched on trees, metal posts and cement walls.

Escape in the city

We found that even though sprinting performance is lower on artificial perches, lizards often perch on these surfaces. It’s likely that behavioral modulation plays a role in increasing their success in evaluating predation risk when using these perches. If I were to continue this study, I would track individual lizards to contrast their response when perching on the various natural and man-made surfaces. Additionally, multiple tests on marked individuals would allow for a more appropriate test of habituation across these populations.

Anoles as Models for Dry Fibrillar Adhesion

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The adhesive structures of geckos have been the subject of extensive inquiry across a variety of disciplines ever since Autumn et al. (2002) discovered that van der Waals intermolecular forces are the main driver of gecko adhesion. Geckos adhere to surfaces using expanded subdigital scales (scansors/lamellae) that are covered in thousands of beta-keratin fibrils (setae) that branch into hundreds or thousands of triangular-shaped tips (spatulae) that are about 200 nanometers in width (see slideshow for images). Spatulae make intimate contact with a surface resulting in van der Waals intermolecular forces. Gecko adhesive toe pads are multifunctional; they are a reversible dry adhesive, they can adhere to a variety of surfaces, they can adhere underwater in some conditions, they have self-cleaning and self-drying capabilities, and they can adhere in a vacuum (see Autumn et al. 2014 for a recent review of gecko adhesion). A number of gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives have been generated over the years, but have not yet managed to replicate the multifunctionality observed in the natural system (Niewiarowski et al. 2016). There are a number of potential explanations for this, but one could be that most gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives are simplified single fibers that do not fully replicate the multiply branched structure of gecko setae. Anoles, however, have independently evolved adhesive toe pads with fundamentally simpler microstructures compared to their gecko counterparts; anole setae are single fibers with a single, larger spatulate tip and more closely resemble the gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives that are currently capable of being generated (see slideshow for images). Therefore, anoles may be an excellent model fibrillar system to better understand the observed functional discrepancy between synthetic and natural fibrillar adhesives.

In an invited paper recently accepted for publication in Integrative and Comparative Biology, my co-authors and I (see full citation below) briefly reviewed the relevant literature concerning the anole adhesive system, discussed how investigation of this convergently evolved system could impact our general understanding of fibrillar adhesion, and suggested a number of hypotheses and areas of future inquiry that could be tackled in future work.

Anole adhesive toe pads have often been suggested as evolutionary key innovations (Losos 2011), yet they have not been nearly as well studied as gecko adhesive toe pads. Nevertheless, general morphometrics, clinging ability on smooth substrates, and correlations between adhesive toe pad size, clinging ability, and habitat use have been reported for anoles (Losos 2011). Studies, however, reporting Anolis clinging ability on ecologically-relevant surfaces, detailed morphometric data of anoline setae, and the multifunctional properties of anoline adhesive toe pads are limited or nonexistent. Anoles may be excellent models for fibrillar adhesion for four main reasons: (1) anole setae are closer in dimensions and morphology to the currently producible gecko-inspired synthetic adhesives, (2) anole setae are not multiply branched which may reduce the complexity of modeling and/or explaining adhesion especially under non-ideal circumstances, (3) anole setae also more closely resemble the theoretical models previously used to explain gecko adhesion, and (4) the extensive evolutionary and ecological data on anoles may assist in answering persisting questions regarding the adhesion ecology and evolution of adhesive pad-bearing lizards.

Although the gecko adhesive system has been particularly well-studied over the past two decades, many fundamentals of biological fibrillar adhesion still need to be worked out or are otherwise unknown. We believe that parallel investigation of the anoline fibrillar adhesive system may assist in filling these gaps in our knowledge, and thus we encourage an interdisciplinary, communal effort to investigate the adhesive ecology, evolution, morphology, performance, and behavior of anoles.

Full citation

Garner, A.M., M.C. Wilson, A.P. Russell, A. Dhinojwala, and P.H. Niewiarowski. Going Out on a Limb: How Investigation of the Anoline Adhesive System can Enhance our Understanding of Fibrillar Adhesion. Integrative and Comparative Biology. In pressLink to article.

References

Autumn K, Niewiarowski PH, Puthoff JB. 2014. Gecko Adhesion as a Model System for Integrative Biology, Interdisciplinary Science, and Bioinspired Engineering. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 45(1):445-470.

Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YA, Peattie AM, Hansen WR, Sponberg S, Kenny TW, Fearing R, Israelachvili JN, Full RJ. 2002. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99(19):12252-12256.

Losos JB. 2011. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. University of California Press.

Niewiarowski PH, Stark AY, Dhinojwala A. 2016. Sticking to the story: outstanding challenges in gecko-inspired adhesives. Journal of Experimental Biology 219(7):912-919.

Adaptation by Invasive Maynard’s Anole on the Island of Cayman Brac

A remote island in the Caribbean could offer clues as to how invasive species are able to colonise new territories and then thrive in them, a new study suggests.
Scientists from the University of Plymouth have recently completed extensive research into a lizard population on the Cayman Islands.

Up until the mid-1980s, there had never been a recorded sighting of the Maynard’s Anole (Anolis maynardi) on Cayman Brac island despite it being less than 10km from its native territory, Little Cayman.

However, since the species was first discovered on Cayman Brac in 1987 – in what is thought to have been a human-assisted colonisation – its population has spread right across the 39km² island.

For this study, recent graduate Vaughn Bodden and Lecturer in Conservation Biology Dr Robert Puschendorf conducted a detailed analysis of the invasive species.

They wanted to assess whether individuals at the forefront of the invasion have developed distinct biological traits that are advantageous for dispersal, and compared their findings to animals in the area of first introduction and the native population on Little Cayman.

They discovered the Cayman Brac population has diverged morphologically from the native population, and within the invasive range there was trend of increasing forelimb length from the core to range edge areas. This ran contrary to the expected findings that longer hindlimbs would be the trait selected as a dispersal-related phenotype.

They also showed that the introduced population had lower levels of parasite prevalence, and that both males and females were of significantly higher body condition than the native population.

Writing in the Journal of Zoology, they say the results are a perfect example of how a species can colonise a new territory, and the biological adaptations it can make in order to do so.

Vaughn, who graduated with a First from the BSc (Hons) Conservation Biologyprogramme in 2018, said:

“There has been a history of lizard studies indicating that longer hindlimbs are an important factor affecting movement ability, so to not find longer hind limbed animals on the range edge was a surprise. For parasites, we found a clear decreasing trend in prevalence within the invasive population from the area of first introduction to the range edge, indicating that the parasites lag behind the host during periods of range expansion.

“We think our findings add to the growing body of literature that demonstrates the complex dynamics of species’ invasions. The results highlight that the animals on the range edge of an invasion are likely to be experiencing different ecological selection pressures that can result in changes in behaviour, morphology, and health for the animals.”

Dr Puschendorf has spent several years researching the consequences of emerging infectious diseases and climate change on biodiversity, with a particular focus on Central America. He added:

“Biological invasions are an important conservation threat across the world. However, every invasion needs to be carefully investigated to identify impacts to native eco-systems and identify potential mitigation strategies.

“In this instance there is likely to be limited overlap with, and therefore a limited threat to, the endemic anole population – the Cayman Brac Anole (Anolis luteosignifer) – because one inhabit the crowns of trees while the other is found closer to the ground. This in some ways highlights the challenges biodiversity managers face when managing species invasions with limited resources, and emphasises the need for greater collaboration among scientific and policy communities.”

Effects of Introduced Brown Anoles on the Native Anole of Grand Cayman

Inbar Maayan tells all about her ongoing work in the cover story of this month’s issue of Flicker, the bimonthly bulletin of the Cayman Islands Department of Environment’s Terrestrial Resources Unit. Check it out, and also read about Caymanian fossils and the massive effort to eradicate invasive green iguanas (half a million and counting!).

A. carolinensis

Green Anole

Appearance: Anolis carolinensis is a beautiful green lizard, growing to approximately 8 inches in length, including the tail. Males are larger than females and have proportionally larger heads. The dewlap is usually pink (but can also be grayish or greenish), and is much larger in males than in females. Green anoles can undergo dramatic color changes, from bright green to dull olive, brown, and even yellowish. For this reason, many people in Florida call them “chameleons,” although the green anole’s color-changing ability is modest compared to the true chameleons (Chamaeleonidae) of Africa and Madagascar. 

Ecology and Habitat: The green anole’s body shape is that of a trunk-crown ecomorph. But with no other native anoles sharing its range in the southeastern U.S., it historically ranged from the ground to the treetops, making it more of a habitat generalist than Greater Antillean trunk-crown anoles. Today, it shares much of its range with the brown or festive anole (A. sagrei), a Cuban species introduced to Florida around the turn of the 20th century. Many observers believe that the brown anole is driving a decline in green anole populations. This may be true in some places, but another possibility is that green anoles spend more time in the trees where they coexist with brown anoles. In fact, in areas where these two species coexist, the green anole is usually seen on higher perches than the brown anole (which, as a trunk-ground ecomorph, is typically found within a couple of meters of the ground).

Green anoles are active foragers, moving around trees and shrubs in search of prey. They primarily eat insects and spiders, but will also prey on small vertebrates, consume fruit, and even drink nectar from flowers.

Geographic Range and Biogeography: Anolis carolinensis lives throughout the southeastern U.S., from Florida to North Carolina on the Atlantic coast, and west along the Gulf coast through Texas, all the way to the Rio Grande.

Its closest relative is the Cuban trunk-crown species, A. porcatus. Genetic analyses show that the green anole is probably descended from A. porcatus populations from western Cuba, which probably dispersed over water to Florida. The extent of genetic differences between A. porcatus and A. carolinensis suggest that these two species have evolved independently for at least 6 million years, which means that humans played no role in the original colonization of North America by the ancestors of today’s A. carolinensis.

Finally, the green anole itself has become established in many places outside its native range, probably because of its popularity in the pet trade. Today, you can find A. carolinensis in the Pacific (Hawaii, Guam, Palau, and other islands), the Caribbean (Grand Bahama, Anguilla, Grand Cayman), and in southern Japan.

Research Highlights

Anolis carolinensis is a very well-studied species. In a charming 1876 paper titled “The Florida Chameleon,” the Rev. S. Lockwood recounts detailed observations of his pet green anole, a lizard he called “Nolie,” and concludes that the green anole “…is everything that is commendable; clean, inoffensive, pretty, and wonderfully entertaining; provoking harmless mirth, and stirring up in the thinker the profoundest depths of his philosophy.”

Anolis carolinensis, two subadults in a an aggressive interaction, photographed in Florida. (© Day’s Edge Productions)

Since the late 19th century, biologists have learned a great deal about the green anole, and it has become a model organism for studying many aspects of reptile biology, including the regulation of behavior and reproduction by hormones, social behavior and communication, and the biology of regeneration (because, like most anoles, the green anole can lose and re-grow its tail). In 2011, because of its key role in many subdisciplines of biology, the green anole became the first reptile species to have its entire genome sequenced.

A few recent studies are particularly fascinating. Recall that green anoles coexist with invasive brown anoles (A. sagrei) in parts of their range (see Ecology and Habitat above). In a 2014 study, Yoel Stuart, Todd Campbell, and colleagues studied these two species in Florida by introducing brown anoles to a subset of small, manmade islands that were already inhabited by green anoles. They found that not only did green anoles move to higher perches on the islands they shared with brown anoles, but that over a period of 15 years, the green anoles evolved larger toe pads and more toe pad lamellae (both traits associated with better climbing ability). This may be the best evidence yet that competition between anole species can drive their evolutionary diversification.

Green anoles were in the news again after a 2017 study by Shane Campbell-Staton and colleagues. Studying green anoles in Texas, they measured the lizards’ cold tolerance before and after the winter of 2013-2014, when Texas experienced an abnormally cold “polar vortex” event. Their results show that the extreme cold caused natural selection on the anoles, with southerly populations exhibiting greater cold tolerance after the 2014 polar vortex, on average, than before. Campbell-Staton also used cutting-edge genetic techniques to identify some of the genes that may be involved in cold tolerance.

Species account author: Neil Losin

For more information:
Anolis carolinensis at Animal Diversity Web
Anolis carolinensis at Encyclopedia of Life

A. cristatellus

Crested Anole

Appearance: The crested anole, Anolis cristatellus, is a medium sized lizard (50-75mm SVL in adult males) with a stocky body and relatively long limbs. It is light brown in color and both males and females have varying patterns of dark brown on their backs including mottled coloration, hourglass patterns, and longitudinal stripes. As the common name implies, many individuals have a large tail crest (different from the nuchal crest that can be erected in many species), although there is substantial regional variation in this trait and many individuals have no tail fan at all. Dewlap color is typically two-toned with a yellow center and a thick orange outer edge, although some populations have a more monotone yellow-orange dewlap. Females are smaller than males (30-45mm SVL adults) and have relatively small dewlaps. Post-anal scales are not easily visible in this species, sometimes making it difficult to distinguish females from juvenile males. 

Within the native range, this species may be confused with Anolis gundlachi and Anolis cookiAnolis gundlachi can be distinguished from A. cristatellus by the yellow-tipped chin, blue eye, and solid yellow dewlap, but is otherwise similar in size and appearance. Anolis cooki is more difficult to distinguish from A. cristatellus, but the two only co-occur in the dry forests of southern Puerto Rico. In their non-native range in Florida, this species may be confused with Anolis sagrei, which is slightly smaller in size and has a dewlap that is red-orange in the center with a thin band of yellow on the edge. 

A. cristatellus male with large tail crest (left) and without (right). Both are in head-down foraging position.

Ecology and Habitat: The crested anole is a trunk-ground ecomorph. It typically perches relatively low to the ground (around 2m high or lower) on broad diameter trees. It is often observed in foraging position on tree trunks with head downward as it sits and waits for insect prey to pass by on the ground. It typically eats insects and spiders, but is also known to consume fruits and to prey on small vertebrates, including anoles of their own and other species. This species is rarely seen on the ground except for when moving between perches or catching prey. Like other trunk-ground ecomorphs, A. cristatellus, has relatively long limbs and a stocky build ideal for quickly navigating both arboreal and ground habitat. Anolis cristatellus is commonly found at lower elevations in warm forest habitats and is often restricted to edge or open, disturbed forest habitat at cooler, high elevations. This species is the most common and abundant anole in urban areas in Puerto Rico.  

Body size differences are the easiest way to differentiate adult female (left) and male (right) A. cristatellus. (Photo by Kristin Winchell)

Geographic Range and Biogeography: Anolis cristatellus is endemic to the Puerto Rican bank (Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands). Its closest relative is A. desechensis, which is found only on the island of Desecheo off the west coast of Puerto Rico. It is also closely related to A. scriptus (found in the Turks and Caicos), A. cooki (found in dry forests in the southwest of Puerto Rico), and A. monensis (found on the island of Mona off the coast of Puerto Rico). Genetic analyses indicate that the ancestor to A. cristatellus (and 12 other Puerto Rican species, which make up the “cristatellus” group) likely colonized Puerto Rico from Hispaniola at least 40 MYA. More recently, A. cristatellus has established in several places outside of its native range, facilitated largely by sale of tropical plants. In particular, it is established in Miami (Florida), DominicaCosta Rica, Mexico (Yucatan), Trinidad, Saint Martin, and the Dominican Republic. 

Research Highlights:

 Anolis cristatellus is a great study species for answering so many different questions! As the most wide-ranging Puerto Rican species, it is perfect for comparative studies. Researchers have found no end to the questions they can answer by examining variation within A. cristatellus in different environments and between A. cristatellus and other Puerto Rican species.   

An urban A. cristatellus male perched on a metal fence in Puerto Rico. (Photo by Kristin Winchell)

For example, with populations in cold, wet, montane habitats to hot, dry, coastal habitats and everything in between, A. cristatellus is perfect for comparing how populations vary in physiological tolerances. Because of this, A. cristatellus has played a major role in our understanding of thermal preferences and tolerances. This follows largely from Ray Huey, Paul Hertz, and colleagues’ foundational work in the 1970’s-80’s, which compared thermal preferences and tolerances of A. cristatellus and established that A. cristatellus is a thermoconformer in some habitats and a thermoregulator in others. Recent work on thermal tolerance in A. cristatellus has made great strides in our understanding of thermal physiology of anoles. For example, researchers have found that thermal tolerance in A. cristatellus can rapidly shift in new environments. Manuel Leal and Alex Gunderson found that in Miami A. cristatellus tolerate much cooler temperatures than populations in Puerto Rico, and Shane Campbell-Staton and Kristin Winchell found that urban populations in Puerto Rico tolerate much hotter temperatures than nearby forest populations.  

Male A. cristatellus with dewlap extended.
Male A. cristatellus with dewlap extended. (Photo by Kristin Winchell)

In addition, because they are widespread in disturbed environments in their native and non-native range, they provide a great opportunity to study rapid contemporary adaptation in response to environmental change. For example, Luisa Otero has found that reproductive patterns vary with habitat disturbance over small geographical scales and Joshua Hall found that embryo survival and development is impacted by urban thermal spikes. Urban environments in particular have received substantial attention, with researchers in Miami examining invasion dynamics and artificial night light use, and researchers in Puerto Rico finding shifts in habitat use, morphology, and performance in urban environments.  

Species account author: Kristin Winchell 

For more information:  

Reptile Database: http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Anolis&species=cristatellus 

Animal Diversity Web: https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Anolis_cristatellus/ 

Invasive Species Compendium: https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/93810 

A. distichus

Bark Anole

Appearance: Anolis distichus, the bark anole, is a medium sized anole with a body color that varies from gray, to brown, to green – depending on the population. Body coloration is similar in both sexes but females can be distinguished from males by their lack of a dewlap, smaller adult size, and a relatively flatter head than males. Male dewlap color in this species is widely variable with populations ranging from pale white or yellow, to populations with variably sized red or orange spot in the center, to populations with entirely red or orange dewlaps. Bark anoles co-occur with a variety of species, most of which can be easily distinguished as different ecomorphs with larger heads or bodies such as Crown Giant and Trunk Ground anoles, or more slender frames such as of Trunk Crown, Grass Bush and Twig anoles. In Haiti and the Dominican Republic, the range of bark anoles overlaps with those of other closely-related trunk anole species – Anolis brevirostrisAnolis caudalisAnolis marron, and Anolis websteri. These species all have a black spot on their neck, which is lacking in Anolis distichus.

Ecology and Habitat: Anolis distichus are trunk anoles, an ecomorph with a compact body plan – short snout and tail, with a relatively wide midsection. Trunk anoles like Anolis distichus primarily occupy the vertical surfaces of trees, usually below the canopy. They are found in a wide variety of natural habitats including xeric scrub to mesic humid forests as well as human-created habitats like buildings, parks, fruit tree groves, and residential areas. Unlike other ecomorphs that flee up trees or run to the ground when approached, bark anoles often shimmy to the opposite side of the trunk, a behavior commonly referred to as “squirrelling”. Bark anoles will eat nearly any prey that can fit in their mouth but their primary diet includes small arthropods like crickets, beetles, and even bees! Bark anoles are especially fond of ants.   

Geographic Range and Biogeography: Bark anoles are native to Hispaniola (Haiti and the Dominican Republic) and the central Bahamas. Although they were once considered native to Florida, genetic data suggests these populations are the result of multiple introductions from Hispaniola and the Bahamas some of which occurred at least 50 years ago. They are thought to be introduced to Abaco Island in the northern Bahamas, but fossil evidence of this species on Abaco puts the status of this population into question. Phylogenetic evidence finds that bark anoles arose on the northern paleo-island of Hispaniola, dispersed over-water to colonize the the Bahamas, and spread to areas of to the southern Hispaniolan paleo-island after the two paleo-islands fused to form present day Hispaniola. 

The immense variation in body and dewlap color in bark anoles has led to the description of 18 subspecies of Anolis distichus. Research currently underway seeks to understand if these subspecies are in the process of speciation or have perhaps already achieved species status. 

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-6.png

Research Highlights:  

Bark anoles have long been the intensive research effort with particular interest in using bark anoles to understand 1) the evolution of signals and 2) the process of speciation.  

Most anole species possess and make extensive use of their colorful dewlaps for signaling to each other as well as other species. A series of studies led by Julienne Ng has shown that dewlap color is a heritable genetic trait and is associated with signaling environment that animal occupies. Exciting research, currently underway by Winter Beckles, seeks to understand if bark anole populations shift their dewlap color in response to changes in their light environment caused by hurricanes. 

Julienne Ng has also found that some subspecies with different dewlaps interbreed freely over a wide geographic area. In contrast, other subspecies pairs are confined to a narrow hybrid zone suggesting that, for these subspecies pairs, hybridization may have negative fitness consequences and those populations may be in the process of speciation. Research I performed as part of my dissertation also found that transitions in dewlap color are associated with diversification events suggesting dewlap divergence may play in role in driving or maintaining speciation events.  We also found evidence found that there are more distinct lineages that previously recognized within the Anolis distichus group and one subspecies in particular – Anolis distichus dominicensis is actually three separate lineages. Work I performed with undergraduate researcher (now Yale PhD student) Daniel MacGuigan used multispecies coalescent methods to assess if Anolis distichus represents a single species or multiple species. We found support for at least seven distinct species in the group, but at present we have not updated the taxonomy because the boundaries between these species remain unclear, particularly for the separate lineages of A. distichus dominicensis.  

Species account author: Anthony J. Geneva 

For more information:  

Encyclopedia of Life 

Reptile Database 

A. sagrei

Brown Anole

Appearance: Anolis sagrei may not be the most colorful or strikingly patterned anole, but owing to its widespread distribution and high abundance it may the anole most familiar to you. Adults commonly grow to 7-8 inches from head to tail with females being a few inches smaller than males. Their body color ranges from light tan to gray to dark brown, almost black. Unlike green anoles that can turn brown, these guys are never green! Males have red-orange dewlaps, sometimes with a yellow border or blotches. Females often have a pattern with diamonds, bars, or a stripe running down their back. When in south Florida don’t confuse brown anoles with crested anoles (Anolis cristatellus). Crested anole females only have a cream-colored stripe on their backs, and brown anoles do not have a light ring around the eye or a light stripe above their front limb. Brown anoles often have two dark bars above their eyes.

Ecology and Habitat: The brown anole is a trunk-ground habitat specialist or ecomorph. They are often found on the ground or perching low on tree trunks (up to 1.5 m high). Brown anoles have relatively long limbs for their body size, which allows them to run fast on the ground and tree trunks that they typically occupy. Brown anoles are usually sit-and-wait foragers, keying in on the movement of prey to jump from their perch and attack. Their diet consists of a wide variety of arthropods including most any spiders and insects they can fit in mouths. They will occasionally eat other invertebrates and small vertebrates including their own hatchlings. Brown anoles primarily occupy disturbed and edge habitats in both natural and human-modified landscapes. Their abundances suggest they are just as at home in the city as in natural areas. Like tourists at the beach, these guys love the sun – they are often active during the hottest parts of the day. All anole species display, but brown anoles are the champions – they are often seen fanning their brightly colored dewlaps, and doing head-bobs and push-ups with the intensity and stamina of an Olympic athlete. 

Geographic Range and Biogeography: The native range of the brown anole includes the Bahamas, Belize, Cuba, Cayman Brac, Little Cayman, Swan Island and the Gulf of Mexico/Caribbean coast of Mexico. Its evolutionary origin as part of the 15-species sagrei group is Cuba with multiple colonization events to Caribbean islands east and west of Cuba to round out its native range. One of the best natural colonizers of all anoles, brown anoles are also the undisputed champion of recent human-mediated introductions. Non-native populations are well established around the world including the southeastern United States (e.g. Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Texas), Atlantic islands (e.g. Ascension, Bermuda), Caribbean islands (e.g. Grand Cayman, Grenada, Jamaica, St. Vincent), and Pacific islands (e.g. Hawaii, Taiwan), among other locations with reports of new introductions every year. Genetic analyses reveal multiple origins of these introduced populations from numerous localities in Cuba as well as the Bahamas and Belize. A key discovery about these introductions is that genetic variation from these multiple native-range sources mixes within non-native populations, resulting in increased genetic variation compared to native-range populations.  

Research Highlights: 

If Anolis carolinensis (green anole) is the “lab rat” of the reptile world, then Anolis sagrei is undoubtedly the “field rat.” This species has been studied extensively in the field from populations on small islands in the Bahamas to the heart of the city in Miami. A well-studied natural history, high local abundance, and the ability to tag individuals for unique identification make this species ideal for field studies of natural selection. We have learned that natural selection acts on morphological, physiological and behavioral traits of brown anoles. For example, natural selection favors longer hindlimbs in the presence of terrestrial predators (curly-tailed lizards, Leiocephalus carinatus) and higher optimal performance temperatures in warmer habitats. Other studies show adaptive responses of limbs to local vegetation after being introduced to new islands. A recent study by Oriol Lapiedra and colleagues evaluated whether natural selection acts on variation in risk-taking behavior of brown anoles when they occupy small islands with and without the ground predator Leiocephalus carinatus. Brown anoles that avoided the ground in lab trials were favored in the presence of the predator, whereas more exploratory brown anoles survived better in the absence of the predator. Moreover, selection on behavior and morphology acted independently. This experiment is among the best studies yet showing that natural selection acts on behavior.  

AA post:  https://www.anoleannals.org/2017/06/27/evolution-2017-it-doesnt-pay-to-be-risky-when-predators-are-about/ 

Brown anoles are also a key species in studies of the consequences of global environmental change, including biological invasions, climate change, and urbanization. Recent studies of non-native brown anoles in Miami by Jason Kolbe and his lab discovered that brown anoles living in the city have consistently different personalities compared to their forest counterparts – city lizards are more tolerant of humans, less aggressive, more exploratory in new environments, and bolder after simulated predator attacks. Cities also dramatically alter the ecological niche space occupied by brown anoles. Urban heat islands produce warmer microclimates that allow brown anoles to more often attain their preferred body temperatures during the summer in Miami, likely increasing their ability to persist in some areas. Brown anoles prefer to perch on broad substrates like tree trunks, and urbanization typically results in the removal of smaller trees and the addition of broad diameter artificial structures, such as light posts and utility poles. This leads brown anoles to use broader perches in urban areas despite the fact these artificial substrates are often quite smooth and lizards slip and fall when using them.  

Video:  https://www.anoleannals.org/2016/09/08/lizards-running-and-slipping-in-ultra-slo-mo/ 

For more information:  

Animal Diversity Web: https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Norops_sagrei/ 

SREL: https://srelherp.uga.edu/lizards/anosag.htm 

The Reptile Database: http://reptile-database.reptarium.cz/species?genus=Anolis&species=sagrei 

Anoles by the Numbers, Part II: Museum of Comparative Zoology

I recently wrote a post on the history of Anolis species descriptions using the Reptile Database (Uetz & Stylianou 2018). This got me thinking, how does my current institution fit into this? I’m currently a grad student in the herp department at the Museum of Comparative Zoology, former home of many anole greats, including Albert Schwartz, Ernest Williams, Skip Lazell, Jonathan Losos (still affiliated but now based at WashU), and many more. And as Jonathan has pointed out previously, it’s home to the greatest number of Anolis specimens of any museum. So I wondered, with such a rich history of anole research, what do our collections look like? How many specimens do we have now? How many species? How has the collection grown over time? So get ready for Anoles by the Numbers Part II: MCZ.

A brief note on methods – all data comes from a spreadsheet I downloaded of all current Anolis specimens in the MCZ from MCZBase (downloaded 2/8/19). For total numbers of specimens per species/subspecies/locality, I simply count records (each record corresponds to a single specimen). For the main summaries of collectors, I treat every collector listed with a specimen as independent, so if someone is listed as the main collector for one specimen but as a “co-collector” for 9 others, they will be summarized as collecting 10 specimens. Due to some formatting issues, a small number of specimens got filtered out (early ones in particular), but I think it’s a pretty good start. I also did a subset of visualizations for the “Top 10 Collectors” – these were defined as the 10 researchers who collected the most specimens overall.

The MCZ was founded in 1859 by Louis Agassiz (more on the history here). The first Anolis specimen collected for the MCZ was an A. carolinensis from Milledgeville, GA collected in 1854 (before the MCZ was founded), but the collector is unknown. I can’t track down much info about that specimen. More Anolis specimens were deposited in 1858 and 1859, and since then, the MCZ Anolis collection has grown to include a total of 52,293 specimens. 44,889 of these have specific info on when they were collected.

So, when were the peak periods of growth for the Anolis collection? Looks like the majority happened in the 1960’s and 1970’s.

These specimens were collected by 886 researchers. Most collected <100 specimens each, but a few collected tons! (That doesn’t include the prodigious researcher we know and love, “et al.” I took them out of the analysis.) Some of these collectors spread their work over a number of years, while some had very concentrated efforts. The top 10 collectors together collected a whopping 21,564 specimens.

And how many species do these specimens represent? In total, the MCZ has 378 species (out of 427 described), so 88% of species diversity! Not too shabby. About half of the species are represented by <10 specimens, but a fair number of them have tens to hundreds of specimens. Eleven species even have more than 1000 specimens each! From highest to lowest, these are: distichus, cybotes, sagrei, cristatellus, roquet, grahami, marmoratus, gundlachi, lineatopus, brevirostris, and pulchellus (they’re not on the plot below because they cause so much skew).

What about type specimens? While we don’t have the type for the genus Anolis (that honor belongs to the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences), we do have 146 species holotypes! Their collection follows a similar pattern to general Anolis collection, with a peak in the 60s-70s, but is more scattered throughout the 1900s.

How were all of these specimens geographically distributed? Unsurprisingly, considering the history of research on Caribbean diversification and ecomorphology at the MCZ, 72% of the specimens in the collection came from Caribbean Islands, with 39% from just the Greater Antilles. Central and North American species make up an additional 22%, while South American species make up only 6%. A few specimens came from introduced populations in Guam, Japan, and Micronesia. Hopefully the collection will continue to grow and expand as the field of anole research does too!

I hope you’ve enjoyed this journey through MCZ Anolis history. I’m still relatively new to the field of Anolis biology myself, so if you have any insights or perspectives (or suggestions of other things you’re curious to see with this data), please leave them in the comments!

Meet the Scientist: Ambika Kamath

Ambika Kamath handling an anole in the field. Photo by Claire Dufour.

Where do you work and what do you do?

I currently work at the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science at the University of California Berkeley as a postdoctoral fellow. I study a diversity of topics in behavioral and evolutionary ecology, including the collective behavior of social spiders and tent caterpillars, the intersections of behavioral ecology with the social sciences, and the socioecological consequences of individual variation in Anolis lizards. Prior to this, I did my Ph.D. in the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University, and was a postdoc at the University of California Santa Barbara.

What aspects of anole biology do you study, and what have you learned?

I study two aspects of Anolis biology—individual variation in habitat use, and individuals’ movement patterns in the context of mating systems, with the goal of building a nuanced understanding the microevolutionary processes of natural and sexual selection in these animals. I have learned that the actual lives of Anolis lizards—their daily ecological and social interactions—are much more dynamic and complex than previously expected. When viewed in the light of well-established patterns of adaptation and diversification across populations and species of anoles, this messiness becomes particularly fascinating—it prompts us to ask what processes govern the emergence of population-level and species-level patterns over longer timescales from organisms’ daily lives.

How and why did you start studying anoles?

I began studying anoles in 2009, as an undergraduate field assistant for Yoel Stuart and Alexis Harrison. I was initially fascinated by the questions about rapid adaptive evolution that could be asked in anoles, but very soon came to love the animals themselves!

What do you love most about studying anoles?

I love watching anoles! I find their behaviour endlessly entertaining, but also tractable enough to study fruitfully. I also love the challenge of catching them. And finally, anole researchers are a fantastic group of scientists, and I feel lucky to be part of the crew.

What is your favorite anole species?

I’d have to say Anolis sagrei. They’re robust, widespread, and really fun to watch.

Where can people learn more about you and follow you online?

I’m on Twitter at @ambikamath, and my website is ambikamath.wordpress.com.

Page 48 of 298

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén