Imagine running quickly among a network of obstacles while attempting to maximize performance. It’s not an easy task, but one that arboreal lizards perform every day. In addition to variable inclines and perch diameters, arboreal lizards often encounter obstacles in the form of branches. The size of these branches, and their spacing, could have a significant impact on locomotor performance, such as sprint speed. Using a clever experimental design, Zachary Jones and Bruce Jayne (University of Cincinnati) recently determined how these important characteristics impact running performance in Anolis sagrei, A. carolinensis, and A. angusticeps (Click here to read paper from the Journal of Experimental Biology).

(A) Dorsal view silhouettes of the three Anolis study species compared against the diameter of the running surfaces. The lizards and cross-sectional areas of the running surfaces are all shown to the same scale. All running surfaces were cylindrical, but only one-half of the largest diameter is shown. (B) Schematic diagram of the peg treatments (not to same scale as the lizards). Pegs along the top center were placed at 10 cm (TC10) or 20 cm (TC20), horizontal pairs of pegs (HP) were placed every 10 cm, and alternating pairs of pegs (AP) oriented vertically or horizontally were placed every 10 cm along the length of the primary running surface (gray). The cylinder with no pegs (NP) is not shown.
Similar to previous studies, increases in perch diameter resulted in increased sprinting speed. With pegs added to the perch, things changed. When pegs were placed at 10cm intervals, and sticking directly up from the top of a 3cm-diameter perch, running performance of A. sagrei was sliced in half compared to running on a peg-free perch or a perch with pegs sticking out from the sides. Especially for the smaller perch diameter treatments, the number of pauses increased with increased branching, and this was greatest when the pegs came out from the top of the perch. This increase in pausing results in a decrease in overall speed (increased transit time) as they move through their habitat. This is also a result found by Higham et al. (2001), where turning angles in the locomotor path resulted in increased pausing in Anolis lizards. The take home message is that branching can have a negative impact on locomotion, forcing lizards to take longer getting from point A to point B. This could make them vulnerable to predation or reduce their ability to effectively capture prey.
Luckily, the array of pathways in an arboreal habitat provides an opportunity for Anolis lizards to select what works best for them.