Estrogen Pathway Is Responsible for Facial Elongation

Why the long face?

Why the long face?

When most people think of vertebrate sexual dimorphism (differences between the sexes), they think of elephant seals or red deer. Most of us here, of course, think of the pronounced dimorphism in size and shape in many anole species. Indeed, anoles have served as excellent model systems for the study of sexual dimorphism, particularly the evolutionary forces that give rise to it. Although there has been significant progress since Darwin in our understanding of why sexual dimorphism evolves, we have made less progress in the HOW. That is, what mechanisms during development give rise to what are often extreme differences between the sexes when their genomes are so similar?

When we think of vertebrates where males are larger or shaped differently than females, and have weapons or ornaments, we almost immediately think of testosterone as a mechanism underlying the sex differences. Once sexual maturity happens, the testes start cranking out testosterone, thus causing a change in the male’s phenotypic trajectory. While there is certainly evidence for circulating testosterone to have this effect in some lizards, is this always the case, and does it apply to specific body parts and not just overall size? Aside from the circulating hormone, how are receptors involved in the development of dimorphism? In a new paper by Sanger et al., a novel developmental pathway of sexual dimorphism is described for lizards in the carolinensis clade, which are striking in their elongation of male faces relative to females.

Figure 1a. from Sanger et al. (2014), showing the differnces in head shape dimorphism among anole clades. Note the long male face in A. maynardi, a member of the carolinensis clade.

Figure 1a. from Sanger et al. (2014), showing the differences in head shape dimorphism among anole clades. Note the long male face in A. maynardi, a member of the carolinensis clade.

Sanger et al. tested whether sex differences in several different pathways led to the observed head shape dimorphism in A. carolinensis compared to two non-carolinensis species (A. cristatellus and A. sagrei) that exhibit shorter male faces. They show, using a combination of developmental and molecular genetic techniques, that the extreme elongation of male heads in carolinensis lizards is not due to an androgen pathway (i.e., testosterone) or the somatropic axis (i.e., insulin-like growth factor). Instead, they found a significant shift in the estrogen pathway. Specifically, at sexual maturity, males decrease expression of estrogen receptors (erβ), which is the beginning of a signaling cascade, ultimately resulting in up-regulation of genes involved in skeletogenesis in the skull of males.

Figure 4 from Sanger et al. (2014), showing the molecular pathway underlying facial elongation in A. carolinensis.

Figure 4 from Sanger et al. (2014), showing the molecular pathway underlying facial elongation in A. carolinensis.

This identification of a novel mechanism for the development of sexual dimorphism will certainly stimulate further evo-devo research in anoles and beyond. For starters, is the same pathway responsible for male facial elongation in other species in the carolinensis clade, or are more ‘traditional’ mechanisms operating there? This important research highlights that investigators need to consider all aspects of signaling systems, including circulating hormones, their receptors, and signal cascades that result from activation of a particular pathway. Clearly this paper by Sanger et al. is an excellent step in the right direction for understanding how developmental pathways lead to adult difference in anoles, and it will also steer other investigators to consider a diversity of developmental mechanisms in their quest to elucidate how adults end up the way they do.

Sanger TJ, Seav SM, Tokita M, Langerhans RB, Ross LM, Losos JB, Abzhanov A. 2014. The oestrogen pathway underlies the evolution of exaggerated male cranial shapes in Anolis lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281:20140329.

It’s Time to Retire the Use of the Term “Squamate” from Public Discourse

Let’s face it, “squamate” doesn’t work. It’s an ugly word, and most people don’t know what it means–if anything, it conjures up “squamous cell carcinoma,” a type of skin cancer.

Slide1 More importantly, the term is not needed. Squamate comes from the scientific order Squamata, the lizards and snakes. But we know that snakes evolved from lizards–they are one type of lizard. In other words, lizards do not form a monophyletic group; they are paraphyletic with respect to snakes.

Does this remind you of any other major group of vertebrate? Say, birds and dinosaurs? We all know that birds evolved from dinosaurs, they are a type of dinosaur; dinosaurs are paraphyletic with respect to birds. And so, what is the solution to this problem? We now realize that birds are dinosaurs, members of the Dinosauria. Indeed, failing to recognize birds as a type of dinosaur commits the sin of paraphyly, obscuring the fact that some dinosaurs (in the old sense) are more closely related to birds than they are to some other dinosaurs.

And so, for the same reason, we should start referring to snakes as one type of lizards and, in turn, when we use the term “lizard,” we should understand that we are referring to snakes as well. In other words “Lizard” = Squamata. And, hence, we have no need to use the term “squamate” in common discourse.

 

How Anoles Sense Heat

Ahh, that warmth feels good.

We all know that many anoles species are very good at behaviorally regulating their body temperature by moving from an area that is too hot or too cold to another area that is just right. But how do they actually judge the thermal properties of a particular microsite? There’s been a lot of work on the sensation of temperature in mammals, but not so much in reptiles.

Recently, Erkin Kurganov and colleagues at the National Institutes of Natural Sciences, in Okazaki, Japan began to rectify this shortcoming, and their paper has just been published in Pflügers Archiv – European Journal of Physiology. Here’s the abstract: 

Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) is a member of the large TRP super family of ion channels and functions as a Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channel that is activated by various noxious stimuli. TRPA1 was initially identified as a potential mediator of noxious cold stimuli in mammalian nociceptive sensory neurons, while TRPA1s from nonmammalian vertebrates (snakes, green anole lizards, and frogs) were recently reported to be activated by heat, but not cold stimulus. In this study, we examined detailed properties of the green anole TRPA1 channel (gaTRPA1) related to thermal and chemical stimulation in whole-cell and single-channel recordings. Heat activates gaTRPA1 with a temperature threshold for activation of 35.8 °C, while heat together with allyl isothiocyanate (AITC), a chemical agonist, had synergistic effects on gaTRPA1 channel activation in that either the temperature threshold or activating AITC concentration was reduced in the presence of the other stimulus. Significant heat-evoked gaTRPA1 activation was observed in the presence but not absence of extracellular Ca2+. gaTRPA1 channels were also activated by heat and AITC in excised membrane patches with an inside-out configuration. By comparing the kinetics of heat- and AITC-evoked singlechannel currents, we defined similarities and differences of gaTRPA1 channel responses to heat and AITC. We observed similar current-voltage relationship and unitary amplitudes for heat- and AITC-evoked currents and found that heat-activated currents showed shorter durations of both open and closed times. Our results suggest that the gaTRPA1 channel is directly activated by heat and chemical stimuli.

 

Help Identify Haitian Anoles

IMG_9308Ron Savage, who works for USAID and is currently posted in Haiti, reports “I haven’t been getting out herping in Haiti much since I sold my car but today I managed to go out and check out some relictual forest (at about 2,700 ft elev.) not too far from Port au Prince and photographed these two anoles. This is the first time that I’ve seen this species in Haiti or the DR come to think of it. They were both up a tree about 15-20 feet and I would say that they were both about 8-9” long including their tails. As you can see, one has a stump tail. He was higher in the tree keeping his eye on the greener one. I honestly don’t know what these are, do you have any idea? It could actually be two species. I’m not familiar with A. ricordii, but I suppose this could be one.”

IMG_9268

Today Is Anolis maynardi Mating Day

maynardi mating shipman

Reports Pat Shipman in Little Cayman, adding “Notice the difference between her expression and his.  Anolis maynardi on Little Cayman, just after a nice rain.”

And notice that sexual dimorphism in snout length!

Spotlight on Cuban Anoles, Part II: Anolis lucius

_1040720
Find this week’s anole!

Before leaving for Cuba, Martha and I discussed our anole wish-list. Figuring prominently were Cuba’s legendary sister-species, A. bartschi and A. vermiculatus. Also swiftly declared were the beautiful A. allisoni and anything in the erstwhile genus Chamaeleolis (alas, we found none of the snail-eating giants). However, I must admit — I had no idea A. lucius existed until I first laid eyes on it!

_1040717

After encountering A. lucius in a patch of mature forest along a slow-moving stream, my first impression was that it looked and behaved like a trunk anole, if trunk anoles were 150% bigger and had zebra stripes on their heads. Indeed, at the first locality we encountered them, they seemed to favor perching head-down on trunks 1-3m high (with one individual spotted almost 5m high.)

_1040754

Although I’m still fond of my initial diagnosis of “giant zebra-headed A. distichus,” we proceeded to encounter A. lucius in a variety of other habitats. For instance, we found them scrambling over limestone karst and taking refuge in sea cliff caves on Cuba’s southern coast, a habit described in Schwartz & Henderson’s Amphibians and Reptiles of the West Indies. Later I would wonder what A. bartschi, were it to occur syntopically, would have to say about that.

~5m up a tree

~5m up a tree

~2m below ground

~2m below ground

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We also found A. lucius near human habitation, on the streets of Trinidad and the home of a coffee farmer in Cuba’s Topes de Collantes nature reserve park.

_1050297

So it seems clear that this anole is jack of at least a few trades. But wait, there’s more!

A. lucius has a bizarre trait, one that’s shared with a close relative already featured on Anole Annals, A. argenteolus. Can you guess what it is? If you guessed translucent scales on the lower eyelid, you win! The function of these “shades” is not entirely clear, with one obvious idea being that they block harsh sunlight. For what it’s worth, we almost never saw A. lucius close its eyes during the day.

Anolis lucius is one cool anole

Anolis lucius: pretty much obligated to wear its sunglasses at night

A. lucius was, dare I say, a dark-horse third-place finisher on the list of coolest species we managed to see. I’ll (probably) finish off the top three next time with A. vermiculatus!

_1040772

 

PS
Anoles with sunglasses…just stop, evolution.

Is That an Anolis porcatus in Miami?

Photo by Jake Scott

Some people think so, such as this posting on the Association of South Eastern Herpetogists website. I have my doubts about the presence of porcatus in Florida. Anolis carolinensis, after all, is derived from A. porcatus. In reality, it is simply a population of A. porcatus, perhaps smaller than most of their Cuban comrades. Suppose for some reason A. carolinensis started growing larger–wouldn’t they look like the green anoles on Cuba? Anyone have thoughts on whether Cuban porcatus are really in Florida and, if so, how easy it is to identify them?

Photo by Christopher Kirby

Here’s another putative porcatus, this one photographed by Christopher Kirby. Those heads are pretty mean looking, I’ll grant that. Several other photos are also on the ASEH website.

Aggressive Behavior Is Rarely the Result of Circulating Testosterone Levels

Anolis cybotes, one of the species included in Husak and Lovern, still showing its dewlap during copulation.

Anolis cybotes, one of the species included in Husak and Lovern’s study, still showing its dewlap during copulation.

If I were to take survey of Anole Annals readers regarding the factors that regulate aggressive and showy behaviors, I suspect that the vast majority of you would implicate testosterone as the primary culprit. Whether we are discussing humans or nearly any other vertebrate, there is a common societal notion that testosterone fuels these behaviors like oxygen fuels fire. The widespread belief is simple: individuals with more testosterone tend to exhibit more aggressive, ostentatious, and risky behaviors.

For decades researchers have investigated the link between testosterone and behavior in a variety of biological contexts – including different behaviors, experimental manipulations, environmental conditions, and life history parameters – but rarely in wild animals or within an evolutionary context. If the supposed testosterone-behavior correlation is extended to a broader, comparative context, it would suggest that aggressive species should also have higher levels of circulating testosterone than more placid species. But, in an upcoming paper, Husak and Lovern test the testosterone-behavior supposition among Anolis lizards and, quite frankly, turn it right on its head. To give away their conclusion at the outset, three of the four “aggressive” anole lineages examined have evolved this behavior without a clear correlation with circulating levels of testosterone.

Anolis lizards are renowned for their convergent anatomical evolution (reviewed in Lizards in an Evolutionary Tree), but these species have also independently evolved similar behaviors. In a study that was one of the first of its kind, Johnson et al. showed that the Anolis ecomorphs exhibit evolutionary convergence towards similar patterns of aggressive display and territorial behaviors. Trunk-ground anoles tended to be the most “aggressive” ecomorphs, consistently exhibiting higher display rates and  territoriality than the trunk-crown, grass-bush, or twig ecomorphs. Twig species tended to exhibit the least aggressive behavior in the analysis. (Also see Ord et al. 2013 for a more fine-scale dissection of display behavior.) Using this pattern of convergent behavior as a foundation, Husak and Lovern predicted that trunk-ground anoles would have higher levels of circulating testosterone than other ecomorphs from the same island, twig anoles the least. The absolute levels of testosterone might vary depending on the specific lineage in question, but they predicted that the rank-order of testosterone on each island would follow the behavioral continuum described in Johnson et al. In total the authors surveyed circulating levels of testosterone and corticosterone, an adrenal steroid hormone associated with stress, in 18 Anolis species!

Figure 1 from Husak and Lovern 2014: Circulating testosterone levels in 18 species of Caribbean Anolis lizards. Bars group by ecomorph classification (CG= crown giant, GB= grass-bush, T= trunk, TC = trunk-crown, TG = trunk-ground, TW= twig) and color coded by island (white = Bahamas, light gray = Jamaica, dark gray = Dominican Republic, black = Puerto Rico).

Figure 1 from Husak and Lovern 2014: Circulating testosterone levels in 18 species of Caribbean Anolis lizards. Bars group by ecomorph classification (CG= crown giant, GB= grass-bush, T= trunk,
TC = trunk-crown, TG = trunk-ground, TW= twig) and color coded by island (white = Bahamas, light gray = Jamaica, dark gray = Dominican Republic, black = Puerto Rico).

As I already stated, the authors found no support for the idea that elevated levels of circulating testosterone consistently drive aggressive behavior in Anolis lizards. Instead they found that three out of the four clades of trunk-ground anoles had the lowest levels of testosterone, the opposite pattern than would be predicted based on their behavior.

Anolis carolinensis with an Orange Dewlap, or Just Back-Lighting

Check out this green anole photographed at the Archbold Biological Station in Florida by Nick Fletcher, participating in a Cornell University field trip led by Harry Greene.

Green anole. Photo by Nick Fletcher.

Green anole. Photo by Nick Fletcher.

Photo by Nick Fletcher.

Photo by Nick Fletcher.

And here’s one more by Nick, taken a day later.

IMG_1807crop

Photo by Nick Fletcher.

 

Crown-giant habitat overlap

Spring is the season for spotting crown-giant anoles in Miami!

I was hosting (recently graduated Lacertid-ophile, although closet anologist) Dr. Robert Heathcote for a few days this week, and after his failed attempt at catching a Cuban knight anole (A. equestris) a fortnight previous, I had promised to deliver him another! Now, I imagine many AA readers may chuckle at someone foolish enough to promise a crown-giant observation (myself included). Much to my relief luck was on our side and we managed to spot not one, but TWO species practically on top of each other!

test 2

A Cuban knight anole (A. equestris) and Jamaican giant anole (A. garmani) perched within 1-2m of each other in Miami FL – April 2nd 2014, JStroud

Cuban knight anoles (A. equestris) and Jamaican giant anoles (A. garmani) are both non-native introduced species to south Florida.

test 1

A. equestris (left) and A. garmani (right) – habitat overlap in Miami FL, JStroud

Page 159 of 297

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén