Anole Annals

Gunther Köhler has just published a paper in Zootaxa describing the many characters used in anole species descriptions. Here’s how he explains the endeavor:

“Anolis are important research organisms and many articles are published every year dealing with different aspects of the biology of these lizards. However, at this point we still lack detailed and standardized descriptions of all recognized species of Anolis. The species descriptions found in original descriptions, reviews of species groups, or faunal treatments are extremely heterogeneous in regard to content, usage of terms, semantic issues, and characters included. For example, some authors (e.g., Underwood & Williams 1959; Savage & Villa 1986; Köhler 2008) count the number of subdigital lamellae under Phalanges II–IV whereas others (e.g., Schwartz 1973; Williams 1995; Poe et al. 2012) report only the lamellae under Phalanges II and III. Even when the same characters are reported, often differences in definitions are evident with different authors scoring the same character differently, i.e., having different threshold levels for scoring qualitative characters (e.g., whether to consider a scale to be smooth, faintly, or weakly keeled, or not, slightly or distinctly enlarged relative to adjacent scales). Also, the way the data are generated can differ widely depending on the applied methodology. In 1995, Williams provided definitions for 37 morphological characters intended for usage in a computerized key for anoles. Williams’ (1995) approach aimed mostly to bring definitions and encodings of morphological characters usable in a computer program. Therefore, he was forced to simplify many of the included character states thereby masking the extent of variation actually observed in the genus Anolis. This article aims to provide definitions of external morphological characters that are useful in Anolis taxonomy with the goal of establishing a reference for future taxonomic work with these lizards. I am confident that a description containing the set of characters defined here will be reasonably complete for the majority of species. In species that show special morphological differentiations (such as the rostral appendage in A. proboscis), these special features need to be addressed of course. I have included many images illustrating the variation in the characters discussed, although I do not attempt to provide a comprehensive review of the variation in external morphology in anoles.”

A variety of morphometric characters from snout-vent length and head width to postcloacal scale width. Here’s one as an example:

Diameter of parietal scale. The longitudinal (LDP) and transverse (TDP) diameters of the parietal scale are measured. LDP and TDP both are measured at the greatest length and width, respectively. Slender projections of the parietal scale should be ignored in cases where these are beyond the normal concave or convex outline of the scale.

The heart of the paper is a description of a large number of scalation characters and their various alternative states. For example:

Condition of supraocular scales (CSO). These vary from smooth or rugose to weakly or strongly keeled; keeling can be uni- or multicarinate. Examples are given in Fig. 12.

Condition of circumorbital scales (COS). In many species of anoles, a row of small scales separates the enlarged supraocular scales from the scales of the supraorbital semicircles. Thus, this character refers basically to the scales situated medially to the enlarged supraocular scales; laterally to the enlarged supraocular scales usually numerous small scales are present without differentiated scales that can be identified as circumorbitals. Considerable intra- and interspecific variation can be observed in this character as exemplified in Anolis dunni (Fig. 13) with the circumorbital series varying from complete (one or more rows of scales) to incomplete or absent. Whenever one or more enlarged supraocular scales are in contact with scales of the supraorbital semicircles, the circumorbital series are incomplete or absent.

And one more set of examples:

Number of scales between supraorbital semicircles (IO). In most species of anoles a pair of semicircular series of enlarged scales is present in the frontal region between the supraocular discs. The minimum number of scales between the supraorbital semicircles is determined (i.e., usually at the narrowest point; Fig. 22).

Number of scales between supraorbital semicircles and interparietal plate (IP/IO). The minimum number of scales between the supraorbital semicircles and the interparietal plate is determined (Fig. 22). This character obviously is ignored in species that lack a differentiated interparietal plate (e.g., Fig. 22B).

Size of scales adjacent to interparietal plate (ScIP). The relative size of the scales surrounding the interparietal plate is noted. In some species the size of the scales anterior to the interparietal plate differs from those situated posteriorly to it. See examples in Fig. 22.

This looks to be a very useful contribution, particularly as the number of newly described anoles continues to rise.

Several days ago, I reported on skeletal anomalies from this year’s trip to the Bahamas and wondered what cool stuff we might see next. Much to my surprise, the next surprise turned up the very next day, in the form of Mexican anole maestro Levi Gray, making his first appearance in the Caribbean. Welcome to the big leagues, Levi!

The next night, Levi strolled down to our place to do some night herping–and wouldn’t you know?–en route the very first Anolis smaragdinus he had ever seen turned out to be of the three-footed variety. Add another example to our parade of limb-reduced anoles.

Later on, while out looking for more greens, we came across this pair of lizards snoozing.

But closer examination shows that that’s not a pair, but a trio, with one anole sleeping on top of another. Now, that’s something I’ve never seen before!

Lastly, my favorite shots of the trip, now finished.

Anolis sagrei. Photo by Jonathan Losos

Anolis distichus. Photo Jonathan Losos

Anolis smaragdinus. Photo by Jonathan Losos

Hello, Anole Annals readers,

I work for the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science Education Department. To support the anole film that Jonathan Losos talked about on this post, we developed a classroom activity to explore the morphology and the phylogeny of Caribbean anoles using photographs and DNA sequences. The resources are available from our BioInteractive.org website.

Students are given color photographs to sort different anole species into ecomorphs. Having grouped the species, they use an online phylogeny tool to build a phylogenetic tree from the DNA sequences from the same species. The results show that different species from the same islands cluster together, independent of the ecomorphs, suggesting that the ecomorphs are examples of convergent evolution. I’m sure Anole Annals readers are well-versed in this, but we tried to make the research accessible to high school teachers and students. Teachers are always looking for evolution resources that use actual DNA sequences.

Anole trading cards, used in the classroom exercises.

Anolis allisoni, close relative of our friendly neighborhood A. carolinensis, is a remarkable lizard. It’s also no stranger to Anole Annals, and the populations found off the coast of Honduras were just featured here. We saw a lot of these lizards in Cuba, and the post is pretty picture heavy, so join us after the jump for blue-headed lizards.

Read More

…can mean only one thing: Anolis allisoni. I’ve been trawling through twitter today. Searching on “anole” is no longer useful–the term’s been hijacked by very exuberant tweeters talking about the comic book character’s latest sexploits, but a search on “Anolis” still yields dividends. Including a nice article, in Spanish, on A. allisoni from the Cayos Cochinos off the coast of Honduras (discussed previously on AA). Included are some nice photos, like the one above, and several videos.

Or should I say, festive anole? I’ve come to realize that the Anolis sagrei re-branding scheme is taking off. In any case, Janson Jones has a nice, short festive anole story on today’s issue of Dust Tracks on the Web. Head over there to check it out.

We’re back in the Bahamas for our yearly trip monitoring evolution of brown anoles on small islands (most recently reported on a year ago).  These populations were hammered by Hurricanes Irene and Sandy in 2011 and 2012, and are just now recovering. Most exciting to us was one population reduced to two individuals, which seemed to disappear during the course of our visit last year. Had the population gone extinct? No–we’ve found 14 lizards there this far. Hooray.

Part of what we do is capture lizards, bring them back to the field lab, and x-ray them to measure their morphology, to see how morphology changes from one year to the next. And while doing so, we see all kinds of interesting anomalies. For example, check out the left hind leg of this female–she’s missing most of the toes on that foot. Turns out that that lizards lacking the full complement of digits is not very unusual (check out this post from several years ago on more severe mutilations).

But this year we’ve had some more unusual sightings. Check out the left knee of the male below. Clearly, he broke his femur and it grew back oddly. Yet, it works–this guy was fat and sassy. It would seem amazing that a lizard could break its femur and survive, but here’s the proof.

And check out the tail on this guy. Looks wacky, right?

The x-ray, however, doesn’t do it justice. It’s not only wickedly bent to the side, but also upwards!

Photo by Manuel Leal

Who knows what we’ll find tomorrow?