Anole Annals

Anolis stratulus, one of the species studied. Photo by Jerry Husak.

Anoles are no strangers to urban environments. In fact, many anole species seem to do just fine in cities. However, they do face a number of different challenges not present in their native environments. One example is the perches on which anoles move. Andrew Battles, a graduate student in Jason Kolbe’s lab at the University of Rhode island, was interested in exploring how the perch use of two anole species differed between natural populations and urban populations, and what that habitat use might do to their running performance. Andrew studied Anolis cristatellus and A. stratulus on Guana Island in the British Virgin Islands to measure perch smoothness/roughness, perch use, and sprinting performance on various perch types.

Lizards were found most often on artificial perches, instead of natural perches, in urban environments. This is interesting, because such artificial substrates tend to be vertically oriented and significantly smoother compared to natural perches like tree branches and trunks. As predicted, lizards ran more slowly on substrates that are smooth and more vertical, and this was most pronounced in the larger male A. cristatellus compared to the smaller female A. cristatellus and both sexes of A. stratulus. Thus, while optimal substrate use might be inclined, rough, natural perches, these anoles are using smoother, more vertical, artificial perches in urban environments. This fits into a theme present at this year’s SICB meeting that animals often move in ways that seem counter-intuitive at first. How such perch decisions might influence fitness remains an open question. Future work will investigate how availability of perches and alternative escape strategies influence perch selection.

Jamal Murray. Photo from Johnson Lab website.

Activity is where the rubber meets the road in the interaction between organisms and their physical and social environments: in order to acquire energy, attract mates, and produce offspring you have to get up and move around. But what dictates how much activity an individual will engage in? We know a fair amount about what causes organisms to be more or less active, with temperature a particularly important one for ectotherms like anoles. Nonetheless, the physiological mechanisms that underlie activity variation are less well understood. Jamal Murray, an undergraduate in Michele Johnson’s lab, presented a poster at SICB that begins to address this question with the Puerto Rican Anolis stratulus. He put lizards into an enclosure with grids marked on all sides, and measured activity rates as the number of times individuals moved from one grid to another. Afterward, he measured blood glucose levels and found that individuals with higher glucose levels were more active. This suggests a proximate physiological mechanism driving differences in activity rates among individuals and, potentially, populations and species.

Image of an anole with a regenerated tail. The point of breakage (and regeneration) is shown with an arrow. Image from Wired.com

It’s happened to us all: you try so hard not to break the tail when you catch an anole, but inevitably it happens to one. As readers of Anole Annals know, many species of lizards, including anoles, lose their tails as a defense mechanism. While losing a tail, called autotomy, has known detrimental effects on social status in males and reduced locomotor capacity, we know less about other potential costs for a strategy that is intended to keeps lizards alive to reproduce another day. McKenzie Quinn, an undergraduate in Michele Johnson’s lab at Trinity University, wanted to know how losing so much tissue, and then replacing it, might take away available resources from other important processes. She measured changes in egg number, egg size, body size, and fat mass in the liver over the course of three weeks after experimental removal of the tail in green anoles. These females were compared to a control group that did not have their tails removed.

Lizards who had their tails autotomized re-grew their tails over the course of the experiment, whereas control groups that had intact tails had minimal tail growth. Surprisingly, there was no difference between the two groups in any of the traits measured. Females with autotomized tails had just as much growth, just as many eggs of the same size, and just as much fat accumulated in the liver. This suggests that in a laboratory setting females are not taking resources away from growth and reproduction to re-grow a tail. Field studies and additional manipulations of resource availability in the future may help us understand what costs are associated with such an intriguing and seemingly costly defense strategy.

Species studied by Kircher et al. Image credit to Bonnie Kircher.

Readers of Anole Annals are likely familiar with the amazing convergent evolution of habitat use and morphology in Caribbean anoles, but the corresponding divergent and convergent evolution of social behavior has recently captured the interest of anolologists. The species differences in social behavior would seem to be due to differences in how much testosterone, a steroid hormone that regulates behavior in many other vertebrates, but this does not appear to be the case. Bonnie Kircher, formerly of Michele Johnson’s lab at Trinity University and currently at the University of Florida, examined what other aspects of hormone signaling might be responsible for the diversity of social behavior seen in Hispaniolan anoles. Since hormones can only act on tissues that have receptors for them, it is possible that variation in hormone receptors might explain behavioral differences independent of hormone levels circulating in the blood. Since the behavioral differences in anoles involve variation in pushup displays and dewlap extensions, it seems intuitive that there may be differences in receptors for testosterone (androgen receptors) in the muscles responsible for these displays.

Bonnie studied six species of anoles that vary in pushup and dewlap display frequency: A. bahorucoensis, A. brevirostris, A. carolinensis, A. coelestinus, A. cybotes, and A. olssoni. After measuring display frequencies in these six species, the investigators quantified the number of androgen receptors in two muscles that are important for pushup displays (biceps) and dewlap displays (ceratohyoid). As predicted, the results showed that species with higher rates of pushup displays have more androgen receptors in their biceps than species with lower pushup frequencies. Interestingly, this was not the case for the ceratohyoid muscle, which controls dewlap extensions. There was no relationship between androgen receptor density of the ceratohyoid and dewlap display frequency. These results are a tantalizing clue to the still-enigmatic mechanism(s) that underlies anole behavioral diversity.

Photograph of Deep Shukla, courtesy of neuroscience.gsu.edu.

What effect does social rank have on display rate in Anolis carolinensis? Can individual display patterns predict social status? Deep Shukla, a graduate student at Georgia State University in Walt Wilczynski’s lab, addressed these questions during Tuesday’s poster session at SICB 2015. Green anoles often form dominance hierarchies in conditions with limited resources (such as those in captivity). Deep predicted that competition for these resources might also cause behavioral variation in display use between dominant and subordinate anoles. Using a mirror to induce display behavior and a female to induce courtship behavior, Deep counted the number of pushups performed by size-matched male anoles in isolation. He then housed two males together for 7 days to allow males to establish a dominance hierarchy within the cage. After the weeklong cohabitation, Deep again measured display frequency levels for each male.

In the baseline trials Deep found that the males who later were identified as dominant and subordinate males did not differ in the frequency of aggressive or copulatory displays. After cohabitation, display use frequency declined for both dominant and subordinate lizards overall, but dominant lizards showed higher levels of aggression relative to subordinates.  Deep also found that aggressive behavior was correlated with copulatory display before cohabitation; however, this result disappeared after cohabitation. These results suggest that dominance hierarchies in anoles can alter display behavior use based on social rank! This is exciting because it means that dominance hierarchies may be established and maintained in complex ways. Deep is interested in exploring these relationships further by measuring brain metabolic activity and morphology before and after the establishment of dominance hierarchies. Given his preliminary data, it seems likely that there will be interesting differences in the brain that accompany this suite of behavioral changes!

Note: This post was written by Bonnie Kircher, a graduate student studying anole development in Marty Cohn’s lab at the University of Florida.

Anolis sagrei, the almost-ubiquitous brown anole, has spread across a broad geographical range that spans most of the Caribbean. The populations across this range, however, vary extensively in morphological traits. Graham Reynolds, currently a postdoc working with Liam Revell and Jonathan Losos, summarized this morphological variation and described a large-scale phylogeographic study of population differentiation in brown anoles in a talk at SICB on Tuesday.

The context of Graham’s study arose from Lister’s classic 1976 paper showing variation in the number of toe pad lamellae in brown anole populations from different Caribbean islands. Lister found that average lamellae number corresponded to average perch height. More recently, Veronica Gomez-Pourroy’s masters thesis work showed that brown anole morphology varies across mainland Central America, the Swan Islands of Honduras, and the Caribbean.

Graham’s genetic work expanded on the results of Kolbe et al. (2004) and included  samples collected by a large number of collaborators working in 95 localities throughout the Caribbean Basin. Using multilocus nuclear and mitochondrial data, Graham found a large split between the Eastern and Western Cuban clades of brown anoles. Populations from the Bahamas clustered with the Western Cuban clade, and populations from the Swan Islands and Central America were most related to populations from the southern populations of the Eastern Cuban clade.

Graham’s overall aim is to integrate morphology, behavior, and genetics from local to regional scales. Anoles seem to be the perfect group with which to tackle this goal!

A photo of Graham Reynolds holding a Hispaniolan boa. Photo from his website.

The substrate in which an egg develops affects the desiccation tolerance of the hatchling. Photo by Matt Lovern.

Anyone who has set up an anole breeding colony in the lab knows how critical it is to provide the lizards with an appropriate substrate, with the right moisture content, for egg laying and incubation. Yet, in the field, lizards utilize a wide range of available egg-laying substrates. Graduate student Corey Cates in Dan Warner’s lab at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, considered the fitness implications of different egg substrates in a talk in the DEE (Division of Ecology and Evolution) Huey Award Competition for Best Student Presentation at SICB this week.

Corey studied populations of brown anoles (Anolis sagrei) on spoil islands in Tomoka State Park in Florida. Some of these islands contain organic soil and others are covered in broken shell pieces – substrates that differ in both physical structure and moisture content. Corey collected eggs from a laboratory population and incubated them in the lab under “wet” and “dry” conditions in both substrates. He then measured hatching rate, hatchling size, and desiccation tolerance, and his experimental results were striking: hatchlings from the dry soil treatment lost less water than the other treatments in the desiccation tolerance test! When Corey released the hatchlings in the field onto the different types of islands, he found that dry soil hatchlings had higher success than hatchlings from the other treatments on the dry (shell) islands, whereas wet and dry treatment hatchlings survived equally well on wet (soil) islands. Corey also found that the moisture level of the incubation substrate was more critical to hatchling success than the substrate type.

Overall, the adaptive significance of the plastic responses demonstrated in this study is intriguing. Corey’s next steps will include a study of one of the possible mechanisms underlying these results – whether scale number differs between hatchlings in the different moisture treatments.

Juvenile anoles seem to utilize very different habitats than adults of the same species. Could this be a product of intraspecific competition between age classes?

Juvenile brown anole. Photo originally posted by Nick Cairns on AA.

David Delaney, a master’s student in Dan Warner’s lab at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, set out to answer this question using brown anoles (Anolis sagrei), and presented a poster describing his experimental study at SICB this week. He manipulated the densities of adult lizards cohabiting with 6 juvenile lizards within mesh enclosures containing artificial trees in five treatment groups. These groups were: (1) no adults; (2) 1 adult male; (3) 1 adult female; (4) 3 adult males; (5) 3 adult females. Unexpectedly, adult density did not affect the microhabitat use (perch height, perch width, or substrate composition) of juvenile lizards in the enclosures.  However, when three adult male lizards were present, juvenile survival rate decreased and larger juveniles were more likely to survive. These results are intriguing because adult males are a selective force on juveniles, yet in this study, juveniles did not alter their microhabitat use in response to adults. The next question, then, is what is causing the distinct habitat use differences between adults and juveniles in the wild?

Note: This post was written by Bonnie Kircher, a graduate student studying anole development in Marty Cohn’s lab at the University of Florida.

If you’ve ever had a lizard chomp down on your finger, you know that lizard skulls are well-designed for biting!

Ross et al. showed that Anolis lizards have a skull optimized for feeding. Photo of A. evermanni by Michele Johnson.

Dr. Callum Ross, a biomechanist focusing on feeding systems at the University of Chicago, presented a talk at SICB on Monday describing differences in in vivo bone strain between mammal and lizard skulls.  In mammals, the shape of the skull causes strain during feeding to be exerted differently on different bones: the frontal and parietal bones, those that cover the human forehead and back of the head, experience very low strains compared to the maxilla and mandible and zygomatic arches, the bones that support the jaw. Because of this variation in force distribution, the top of the mammalian skull is not optimized to dissipate feeding forces. In contrast, the structuring of lizard skulls is dramatically different. Whereas the mammalian skull is designed to protect the large mammalian brains, lizard skulls contain much smaller brains . To determine how strain gradients are distributed across lizard skulls during feeding, Ross measured strain magnitude in vivo across four lizard species, Tupinambis merianae, Anolis equestris, Gecko gecko, and Iguana iguana. Ross and his colleagues found that lizards experience much higher strains on top of the cranium, the same place at which mammals experienced very low strain, demonstrating a skull design that is more optimized for feeding. He also found that maximum frontal bone sheer strain was highest in Anolis equestris! These results are amazing because they demonstrate a clear morphological trade-off between optimization for feeding in lizards versus optimization for protecting the large mammalian brain.

Note: This post was written by Bonnie Kircher, a graduate student studying anole development in Marty Cohn’s lab at the University of Florida.