How Different Do Two Different Colors Look? Ask an Anole

In trying to understand the evolution of visual signal diversity we are often faced with problem of asking which of two possible signals is most visible against a particular natural background. Alternatively we may want to know how easily different signals (for example signals of sympatric species) can be told apart.

When animals use colorful signals to communicate with conspecifics, selection will tend to favor colors that are highly visible against the natural background and colors that can easily and unambiguously be distinguished from signals utilized by other similar-looking species. Thus, in order to understand the evolutionary pressures on signal properties, we often want to know how distinct two different colors appear to an animal viewer. Perception of color by most animals differs from human perception because of differences in visual-system anatomy and physiology. How, then, can we quantify the difference in appearance of colors to an animal viewer?

A useful approach is to quantify the perceived difference between color stimuli as a distance in the animal’s “perceptual color space.” This refers to some measure of the difference in sensory stimulation elicited by different colors. At present most studies of visual ecology and communication use one of two methods to measure perceptual color space distance between pairs of colors. The first involves determining the relative stimulation of the different classes of cone photoreceptors by each color stimulus in units of relative photon capture, plotting colors in n-dimensional space (where n is the number of photoreceptor classes), and then measuring a simple Euclidian distance between the points. The second approach involves estimating the noise within each photoreceptor channel, determining the detection threshold – defined as the just-noticeable difference, or JND, between the two colors – determined by photoreceptor noise, and then estimating the distance between two colors in units of multiples of this threshold, or in units of JNDs. The photoreceptor noise method has been shown to be effective for estimating color discrimination thresholds, but the idea that differences between supra-threshold colors can be measured in multiples of the JND is more controversial. Each of these methods has some theoretical support, and each has advantages and disadvantages in terms of assumptions required and the information needed to do the calculations. However, empirical tests of which method works best are lacking, and there is not much agreement on the best way to measure perceived differences between colors that are well beyond the threshold for discrimination.

What we need here is a model system – and that usually means anoles! Anoles have an excellent, well-understood color vision system. Moreover a method has been developed that uses visual attention as an assay of signal visibility. Fleishman et al. (2016) used this method to quantify the visibility of different colors viewed against a gray background by Anolis sagrei. They then used these behavioral results to test the accuracy of the two different popular methods of measuring distance in visual color space. In these experiments anoles viewed a checkerboard of gray squares in their visual periphery (Fig. 1). One square was then abruptly shifted to some other color. The distance in color space from the initial gray to the newly appearing color was determined using the two different metrics described above. The probability of a gaze shift towards the novel colored stimulus was quantified, and colors throughout the anoline color space were tested. The probability of detection was then plotted against the different measures of perceptual color distance.

anole_annal_fig1

Figure 1. (a) Lizard sits on the perch in a small cage. The experiment waits until its gaze is directed straight outward towards the video camera (t1). At t2 a small colored stimulus square is presented in the middle of the checkerboard visual field. The camera records whether or not the lizard notices the newly introduced color-square and shifts its gaze towards it. See the video above. The video at the top of the page illustrates the appearance of the stimulus to a lizard and shows a positive response.

Which method best predicted the results? It turns out both methods gave excellent predictions of the behavioral data! In this case anoles are the peacemakers. Basically, the information available to the color vision system is how much difference there is in the photon capture by different cone classes exposed to different colors. These two different ways of quantifying this change turn out to give rather similar predictions, and both sets of predictions accurately predict detection probability. Thus the anoles give a firm go ahead for both methods of modeling distance in color space. The ability to easily model distances between colors in anoline perceptual color space should greatly facilitate studies of the evolution of dewlap color diversity because we can easily figure out which color is most visible under each set of natural habitat light conditions.

Now we just have to figure out why Anolis dewlaps come in so many different colors!

 

 

Is There a Crisis in Anolis Taxonomy?

A few days ago, I had a very interesting discussion in twitter with some colleagues (see here [1] and here [2]) about whether there is a decline and crisis of new taxonomists in amphibians and reptiles. I wonder if this situation might be the case fir Anolis lizards, or whether Anolis has its own tendency in species description. So, I decided to take the bull by the horns and I went to the Uetz Reptilia Database to see the numbers.

First, it seems that there is not an increase in species description for anoles across time. In early years, it was a bunch of new descriptions as also recently (Fig 1).

Figure1

However, if you check how many anole taxonomists have described species, an interesting pattern emerges. Very few people have described almost all of anole diversity (Table 1). Only 15 anologists have described all currently known species (400 according to the Uetz database), and more interesting is the fact that only five of them are still alive! (Gunther Köhler, Orlando Garrido, James McCraine, Steven Poe and Larry Wilson; Table 1).

Table 1. Ranking of anole taxonomists by number of species described.

Table 1. Ranking of anole taxonomists by number of species described.

Then, to establish if new authors (new anole taxonomists) are emerging in recent times, I made an accumulation curve of authors across years of description (Fig. 2). I considered only the senior author (Fig. 2, top) and all authors involved in the description  (Fig. 2, bottom). From these figures, it is possible to see, apparently, that very few new authors are emerging as anole taxonomist specialists.

Accumulation of authors by year. Only senior author (top), all authors involved in the description (bottom)

Accumulation of authors by year. Only senior author (top), all authors involved in the description (bottom)

This suggests, at least to me, that something is happening in anole taxonomy. As we discussed in twitter, this scarcity in taxonomists in recent times could be due to several factors: lack of interest in describing new forms, lack of funding resources, lack of access to comparative material (i.e., herpetological collections), lack of writing skills to generate scientific papers, or lack of adequate taxonomic training. In any case, I feel that anole taxonomy would be in crisis if new people, mostly from Latin America, are not interested in describing and revising new species in each country. But, why are very few people seem to be interested in describing new valid species nowadays? Is it perhaps that taxonomy is a discipline with little interest in academia? Does doing so serve to get a job? Is it not worth publishing papers in taxonomy or even describing new forms?

Although today there are a bunch of journals oriented to taxonomy and many online resources to access to primary literature (Sci-Hub [3], BHL[4], etc.), it seems that very few people are interested to tackle these problems in our iconic lizards.

I would like to see your opinions on this

References

[1] https://twitter.com/CrawfordAJ/status/713398834005561344

[2] https://twitter.com/CrawfordAJ/status/713459231983280130

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sci-Hub

[4] http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org

City Slickers: Performance and Substrate Properties in Urban Anoles

Anolis cristatellus on a smooth, vertical substrate in Puerto Rico (photo by K. Winchell)

Anolis cristatellus on a smooth, vertical substrate in Puerto Rico (photo by K. Winchell)

In urban areas, the number of natural substrates (e.g. trees) is reduced. In their place are novel manmade substrates (e.g. walls, metal gates). These surfaces undoubtedly have different properties relevant to anole locomotion: they are smoother, harder, and (in the case of walls) much broader and flatter compared to natural surfaces in a forest. In urban areas lizards still use these substrates at high frequency, but do they do so effectively? Kolbe and co-authors began to dive into this complex topic in their recent publication, “City slickers: poor performance does not deter Anolis lizards from using artificial substrates in human-modified habitats” (Kolbe et al. 2015).

The relationship between habitat use, morphology, and performance for anoles has been extensively studied in natural environments (reviewed in Losos 2009). Urban environments add new dimensions to this area of research. Resource distribution and abundances differ drastically compared to natural areas. For example, the distribution of available perches and what they are made of in urban habitats is very different from a forest. Moreover, the properties of these resources differ drastically as well: urban substrates are smoother, broader, and have different thermal properties, to start. Understanding these differences in habitat use and how they influence performance and, ultimately, adaptive responses in anoles is the topic of ongoing collaborative research that I (K. Winchell) and the Kolbe lab  have been conducting.

Anole March Madness: Round 1 Complete!

Anole MM16

If you’ve been following along with our “Anole March Madness” tournament and you didn’t catch the updates on Twitter, you’re in luck. Here are the recaps of the second half of the Round of 32.

And of course, we remind our readers that these battles are fictional and are meant to highlight ecology, distribution, and traits of some well-known and not-so-well-known anoles. All battles are written by myself (K. Winchell), Martha Muñoz, and Pavitra Muralidhar using “complex algorithms” to determine the ultimate champion.

The next round (Sweet 16) kicks off on Twitter March 28 at 8pm. Follow along live and tag your comments #AnoleMM2016! Also next week we will be highlighting the “state of the knowledge” about the anoles featured in our tournament. Any guesses (no cheating) which species has the most citations and which has the least? We’ll give you the run-down of what we know and don’t know about who.

And here’s the recap of the second half of the Round of 32!

Download Skip Lazell’s 1972 Monograph on the Anoles of the Lesser Antilles

From Skip Lazell's 1972 monograph

From Skip Lazell’s 1972 monograph

Like many other biodiversity journals, the contents of the Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology are available on the Biodiversity Heritage Library. However, the BHL can be somewhat cumbersome to deal with, if not downright counterintuitive. Just today, I downloaded Lazell’s spectacular, classic monograph on the Lesser Antillean anoles, full of detailed descriptions, lovely illustrations (as above) and incisive commentary. Every digital library should have a copy, and so here’s your chance to get one easily, by clicking on this link. But note: the link apparently is only good for 30 days (and someone had to try it twice to get it to work, so be persistent). Also note: it’s a big file, so be patient as it downloads.

Enjoy! And after you look it over, write a nice comment for Skip, AA‘s all-time leading commenter, to read.

Expanding the Scope of Research on Island Anoles

 

Male Anolis nebulosus

Male Anolis nebulosus

With few exceptions, there has been far less research on the ecology and evolution of anoles inhabiting islands off Central and South America compared to anoles on islands in the West Indies. Siliceo-Cantero, Garcia, Reynolds, Pacheco and Lister (2016) have recently taken a step towards leveling the playing field by making a detailed comparison of a mainland A. nebulosus population residing in the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in western Mexico, and a population inhabiting the small island of San Agustin in the Bay of Chamela just 5 km from the mainland study site. Their research focused on three central questions: (1) To what extent has the island population diverged morphologically, behaviorally, and genetically from the ancestral mainland population? (2) Does the morphology of the island and mainland populations correspond to any of the six West Indian ecomorphs?, and (3) In the absence of mainland competitors, has the island population undergone niche expansion and evolved towards a generalist phenotype?

Initial analyses of morphology indicated that both island and mainland populations were dimorphic, with each sex in each location having a large-headed, short-limbed morph, and a less common small-headed, long-limbed morph. The only other anole known to exhibit such intra-sexual dimorphism is Anolis agassizi from Mapelo Island, where there are large and small male morphs that also differ in coloration. In keeping with a pattern often found in anoles, island and mainland A. nebulosus morphs showed a significant positive correlation between average size-adjusted upper limb lengths and the mean logarithm of their perch diameters, suggesting that the morphs may be adapted to different microhabitats. Island morphs were also significantly larger than their mainland counterparts, and both the CV and Shannon diversity of the SVL distribution of all four morphs combined were significantly greater for the island population. The authors calculated the area of morphospace occupied by the morphs, as defined by the first two axes of a principal components analysis based on several morphological characters. On both island and mainland, the existence of a second morph doubled the total morphological space of each population. With respect to divergence in shape, mainland male and female morphs had significantly longer snouts and wider mandibles than the corresponding Island morphs. A PCA clearly separated island and mainland males from males of all the West Indian ecomorphs.

Female A. nebulosus

Female A. nebulosus

The genetic divergence of the island and mainland populations was assessed by sequencing both mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Genetic diversity of mtDNA was low on the island (haplotype diversity (h)= 0.50; nucleotide diversity (π) = 0.0007) relative to the mainland (h= 0.95; π= 0.006), and the populations were fairly divergent (Fixation Index = 0.34). Haplotype diversity of nuclear DNA, however, was somewhat higher on the island (h = 0.38 vs. .32). Based on 16,382 SNPs, island and mainland individuals were grouped cleanly by both Discriminant Analyses of Principal Components and STRUCTURE, a Bayesian clustering algorithm, and had 100% posterior support in STRUCTURE for membership in their respective populations. The authors conclude that these results indicate incomplete lineage sorting in mtDNA, as well as a relaxation population genetics model in which the island population is evolving independently of the mainland population under the influence of drift and lack of gene flow.

While the A. nebulosus population on San Agustin has undergone niche expansion in the absence of mainland competitors, there was no detectable evolution towards a generalist morphology, defined as a hypothetical phenotype intermediate between the shapes of the six West Indian ecomorphs. The authors suggest, however, that this definition is unrealistic given that the selective forces necessary to produce such a Jack-of-All-Trades ecomorph are most likely absent on the small islands harboring solitary Anolis populations. Alternatively, they propose that reduction in death rates, higher densities, increased intraspecific competition, and greater male-male competition for females are the major selective forces common to many small islands. A large body of theory and data indicate that all of these forces can drive the evolution of larger body sizes and greater SSD. The authors point out that Schoener’s work documenting wide-spread convergence in body size and SSD among solitary anoles in the West Indies, supports this hypothesis, and predict that the distributions of body size and SSD on single species continental islands should converge on those found in the West Indies (see Figure below).

A. Distribution of SSD indices for 102 Anolis species from the Greater Antilles. Dark grey bars delineate trunk-ground and trunk-crown ecomorphs. B. SSD distribution for 28 solitary West Indian anoles (data from Schoener, 1977). C. SSDs for 60 mainland species. D. Histogram of SSD for four solitary species including A. nebulosus, inhabiting islands off Central and South America (data for A. concolor and A. pinchoti from Calderon-Espinosa and Barragan-Forero, 2011. Data for A. agassizi from Lopez-Victoria et al., 2011). After Fig. 3 in Siliceo-Cantero et al, 2016.

A. Distribution of SSD indices for 102 Anolis species from the Greater Antilles. Dark grey bars delineate trunk-ground and trunk-crown ecomorphs. B. SSD distribution for 28 solitary West Indian anoles (data from Schoener, 1977). C. SSDs for 60 mainland species. D. Histogram of SSD for four solitary species including A. nebulosus, inhabiting islands off Central and South America (data for A. concolor and A. pinchoti from Calderon-Espinosa and Barragan-Forero, 2011. Data for A. agassizi from Lopez-Victoria et al., 2011). After Fig. 3 in Siliceo-Cantero et al, 2016.

Obama’s Historic Visit to Cuba: What about the Anoles?

George Gorman in the field

George Gorman, guru of all things Anolis, writes in:

49 years before Barack Obama’s historic visit to Cuba , I made a historic visit to Cuba but did not visit the Castro brothers, nor was there a baseball game played in my honor. I did, however catch a lot of Anolis,and send a letter to Science about my trip … which was published.”

Read it here.

Anole March Madness: 1/2 Done with Round 1!

Anole MM16

For those of you following the first ever Anole March Madness, the first eight matches were held on Monday and Tuesday evening live on twitter, taking us halfway through the round of 32!

Just a reminder, no animals were harmed in the making of this production and all matches are entirely fictional. We have done our best to make the battles realistic given what is known about the natural history of the species and their habitat. Of course, we have taken minor creative liberties with some details. We also want to point out that while these matchups are for entertainment, we hope you also learn a little about some of the more obscure anoles. It is also an opportunity for us to point out how little is known about some of these species. Please let us know in the comments if you believe some detail to be inaccurate or you have something to add!

And now, the recaps!

Day 1 was exciting with Anolis insignis versus Anolis nebulosus, Anolis onca versus Anolis macrolepis, Anolis cristatellus versus Anolis pulchellus, and Anolis lividus versus Anolis richardii.

Anolis insignis versus Anolis nebulosus
High in the treetops of Mexico perches the diminutive clouded anole,
Anolis nebulosus. A loud rustling of leaves announces the arrival of the massive crown-giant, Anolis insignis. The lizard, famished from his travel from Panama, spots the tiny A. nebulosus and decides he looks like a tasty snack. He slowly ambles across the canopy towards his meal, pauses, then lunges with mouth agape. The agile A. nebulosus leaps to the side, narrowly avoiding the cavernous mouth. Anolis nebulosus watches with curiosity as the striped giant slowly turns toward him, preparing his next attack. Again, A. insignis lunges towards his hopeful meal and again A. nebulosus narrowly avoids being consumed. Wary of the newcomer, Anolis nebulosus retreats below the canopy, to the lower branches where he spots an attractive female. Foolishly thinking he has escaped the unknown giant in the tree top, he begins to dewlap at the prospective mate. Meanwhile, the hungry Anolis insignis stealthily descends to the lower branches and lunges again at the distracted A. nebulosus. This time he doesn’t miss and consumes the tiny anole in a single gulp. ***Anolis insignis wins***

 

Anolis onca versus Anolis macrolepis
At the terminal end of the babbling brook, the habitats of two Colombian anoles, Anolis onca and Anolis macrolepus, converge. Following an escaped beetle downstream, Anolis macrolepis leaps from rock to rock over the rushing water. On his last leap he finds himself no longer on a rock, but on soft sand. Here his troubles are much bigger than an escaped meal as he meets the larger Anolis onca, basking in the sun on the sand. Charged full of energy, A. onca confronts the intruder. Anolis macrolepis attempts to turn to flee, but his feet are poorly adapted to run on this strange, hot substrate. He moves his legs frantically attempting to run, but only digging himself into a hole. Now half buried in the sand, A. macrolepis realizes he is in a precarious situation. Anolis onca approaches his competitor and flings sand in his face. Temporarily blinded, A. macrolepis panics. He begins to flail out of desperation as A. onca firmly grabs him and flings him back into the stream where he is carried out to sea. Anolis onca resumes basking in his sandy home. ***Anolis onca wins***

 

Anolis pulchellus versus Anolis cristatellus
In a patch of secondary tropical forest on the north coast of Puerto Rico, Anolis cristatellus and Anolis pulchellus both enjoy the afternoon, each happily unaware of the other as they occupy distinct structural habitats. The afternoon sunshine begins to wane and A. pulchellus climbs up the side of a tree trunk towards one of the remaining patches of sunlight. Anolis cristatellus suddenly darts around from the other side of the trunk to confront the trespasser. Anolis cristatellus  raises his dorsal crest and stands strong and proud, seeming to grow by almost 2 cm. Anolis pulchellus, with his eye on the prized sunlight, accepts the challenge. He too raises a dorsal crest, dark spots suddenly appear behind his eyes, he sticks his tongue out, and he flashes his large crimson dewlap with confidence. Unfazed, A. cristatellus in turn flashes his bright orange and yellow dewlap and does several pushups as a last warning. Anolis pulchellus does not heed the warning and darts toward A. cristatellus, delivering a sharp blow to his midsection with his pointy snout. Despite the sting of the assault, A. cristatellus manages to bite onto the tail of A. pulchellus. Unable to autotomize his tail, A. pulchellus is swiftly flung from the tree trunk, flying several meters back to his rightful place among the reeds of grass where he decides it prudent to remain, defeated. ***Anolis cristatellus wins***

 

Anolis lividus versus Anolis richardii
On the tiny isle of Montserrat, Anolis richardii has arrived on a piece of driftwood to make its stand against Anolis lividus. There are perches and food for the taking, and only a puny mid-sized anole to defend them. Anolis lividus has spotted this unwelcome intruder and rushes up the tree to evict him. Unaware of their shared evolutionary history, they are briefly confused when they flash their orange dewlaps and, for a moment, wonder whether they’re the same species. Anolis richardii, massive to begin with, cuts an even more impressive figure with an erected nuchal crest, but A. lividus does not back down. However, the Montserratian anole is no match for the massive A. richardii. Its lunges and parries are met with vicious attacks. Anolis richardii delivers a strong bite to A. lividus’ flank. At that moment, the Souffriere Hills volcanic dome collapses, launching a column of ash and pyroclastic material into the air. Anolis lividus is unfazed by the volcano, but A. richardii is terrified by this ominous neighbor and decides to find fertile ground elsewhere. It abandons the perch and the island, leaving A. lividus in disbelief at his luck and the unexpected victor of this encounter. ***Anolis lividus wins***

 

Day 2 was equally exciting with Anolis limifrons versus Anolis humilis, Anolis frenatus versus Anolis transversalis, Anolis placidus versus Anolis distichus, and Anolis trinitatis versus Anolis pogus.

Anolis limifrons versus Anolis humilis
It is early morning in the Costa Rican rainforest. Anolis limifrons has been awake for an hour already, foraging in the leaf litter near the towering buttress roots of a tree. As it plucks a roach into its mouth it freezes. There, not one meter away, is the red and yellow flash of the dewlap of Anolis humilis, a much bigger species. Anolis humilis charges, vying for the insect-rich territory. Anolis limifrons retreats to a crevice in the roots, but then charges back out and and lunges at A. humilis. Anolis humilis is stockier, but slower and less tenacious. Anolis limifrons won’t give up, biting at A. humilis often, displaying, and refusing to back down. Anolis humilis gives one last lunge, but misses, as A. limifrons deftly dodges and swings back around to nip his opponent’s throat. Harangued and weary, A. humilis retreats, leaving A. limifrons to go back to his cockroach feast. ***Anolis limifrons wins***

 

Anolis frenatus versus Anolis transversalis
It is early morning and Anolis transversalis, wide-eyed and nervous, glances around. There are so many things that can eat him here in Amazonia. From above comes an Anolis frenatus, crashing down from the canopy. The crown-giant, startled by his misstep and fall, barely grasps the tree branch as he falls. Swinging upright, he notices he is not alone. Anolis transversalis, petrified that his worst nightmares have come true, turns to run. Anolis frenatus, still confused from the fall, watches as A. transversalis flees frantically, jumping from the branch to an adjacent tree, then to another and another and another until he is out of sight. Uncertain about what just occurred, A. frenatus unknowingly claims victory. ***Anolis frenatus wins***

 

Anolis distichus versus Anolis placidus
It’s late evening now on Hispaniola and the placid anole, Anolis placidus, peacefully perches high in the treetop hugging the twig he plans to sleep on tightly with his tiny legs. Anolis distichus, thinking it best to sleep higher up tonight, ascends to what looks like the best sleeping site only to find it occupied by the little twig anole. Anolis distichus, feeling entitled to this perch, strolls up to A. placidus and begins to display his dewlap. Anolis placidus, ever the pacifist, looks at A. distichus with a sidelong glance and decides there is room enough for them both. Anolis placidus sidles to the end of the perch, pressing his body close to the twig. Anolis distichus, upset that his opponent does not accept his challenge, advances and begins to push-up violently, thinking he may shake the twig anole off of the branch. Anolis placidus edges closer to the end, his tiny legs giving him an unshakeable grip. Clearly his friend needs more room to sleep, that’s fine with him, they can share. Anolis distichus, frustrated with his opponent and now struggling to keep balanced on the moving twig decides intimidation is not enough and leaps towards A. placidus, who skillfully moves to the underside of the twig with only two steps. Anolis distichus lands on the edge of the twig but is unable to grip the tiny perch with his longer limbs. As he flails attempting to grab onto the twig and his opponent, A. placidus inches back away from the edge to the top side to avoid contact. Anolis distichus manages to catch the tip of the branch with a single toe, momentarily hanging on before falling to the branch just below. As his toe releases it turns the twig into a catapult and even the powerful grip of A. placidus isn’t strong enough to hold on. Anolis distichus looks up as A. placidus is flung far out of sight. Anolis distichus ascends to his chosen sleep site, pleased with his skillful removal of the competitor. ***Anolis distichus wins***

 

Anolis pogus versus Anolis trinitatis
Aboard floating vegetation following a hurricane that tore through the Northern Lesser Antilles, Anolis pogus patiently awaits making landfall on St. Vincent island. As the flotsam approaches the shore, the weary castaway spots movement in the trees. Flashes of bright green and blue announce the presence of the resident trunk-crown anole, Anolis trinitatis. Anolis pogus disembarks on the rocky shore and wearily climbs up the nearest trunk, basking in the sunlight and surveying his new home. But there will be no rest for the tired traveller, immediately an A. trinitatis descends and sizes up this newcomer. Anolis trinitatis, a good 2cm larger in body size, decides he does not like new, strange looking anole. He angrily advances and grabs A. pogus by the nape of the neck and flings him. “Welcome to St. Vincent” he thinks, hoping A. pogus will choose somewhere else to call home. Suddenly energized, A. pogus climbs up the adjacent tree and begins to dewlap at his assailant, undeterred by his aggression and larger size. Anolis trinitatis leaps to the tree, accepting the challenge. They trade blows repeatedly – A. trinitatis bites at the face of A. pogus; A. pogus leaps and bites off a sizable portion of A. trinitatis’ tail – both sustain substantial injuries in the battle. Now weary himself and impressed with his opponent’s stamina and scrappiness, Anolis trinitatis attempts one last time to disarm his opponent with intimidation, he dewlaps and pushups but his vigor is gone. The bloodied A. pogus returns the threat by advancing and delivering a calculated blow to the throat, tearing the dewlap of A. trinitatis. Anolis trinitatis has had enough and limps away, defeated, back to the canopy to inform the other native lizards that there is a new lizard on the block and that he’s not one to be messed with. ***Anolis pogus wins***

 

Tune in tomorrow and friday on Twitter for the next matches, and of course we will bring you the recaps here afterwards. Bracket busted already? Did we miss an important detail? Let us know in the comments!

 

Brown Anole Predation by Red-bellied Woodpeckers in Florida

DSC01472

While visiting relatives last week in Fort Myers (FL), anole enthusiast and avid wildlife photographer Kyle Wullschleger noticed a commotion among the trees while on an afternoon hike in a small neighbourhood nature preserve. On closer inspection he witnessed a group of red-bellied woodpeckers (Melanerpes carolinus) foraging on surrounding cypress trees, with a couple eventually appearing with their apparent target–non-native Cuban brown anoles (A. sagrei). He recalls some of the details:

“The photos from the sequence aren’t all that fantastic because I cropped in so it really just shows the behavior. The whole sequence the woodpecker was basically just slamming the anole against the tree and then trying to pick it apart – it was hard to tell what exactly it was doing, but I believe it eventually swallowed it whole before flying away–it hopped behind the tree so I couldn’t see it anymore.”

DSC01451-2

DSC01473

DSC01475

DSC01479

DSC01498

“There were at least five birds all moving up and down the lower third of the cypress trees just around the boardwalk I was on. They were moving around the trees without really knocking the wood, so maybe they were purposefully targeting anoles? I only saw successful predation twice, but the brush is so thick–it’s obviously happening quite a bit.”

Sean Giery had previously discussed the main avian predators of anoles in urban South Florida, but woodpeckers didn’t make the list. Woodpeckers do occur in urban areas of South Florida; a new one to add to the list?

Anole March Madness Begins Tonight!

Anole MM16

Get ready! Anole March Madness begins with the first battles this evening (Monday 3/21/2016) . We will be live broadcasting the bouts on twitter with the handle @AnolisMM2016 starting at 8pm EDT (Boston time). Tonights matches include: A. insignis v. A. nebulous, A. onca v. A. macrolepus, A. cristatellus v. A. pulchellus, and A. lividus v. A. richardii.

Get your brackets filled out, share them on twitter with #AnoleMM2016, and follow along with the live tweets. We will also be posting the recaps of the battles tomorrow morning here on Anole Annals!

slowmobattle1

Let the games begin!

Page 110 of 299

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén