Bob Powell (anolis@swbell.net) writes:I’m working on a CAAR account of Pholidoscelis (including all species) and still need photographs of a few species. Since the islands where they’re found are also inhabited by anoles, I’m hoping you might be able to connect me with some folks who have been to the relevant islands and who might have photos of the ameivas that I could use in the account. The species I am missing are listed below.Thanks for any help you can provide. Cheers, BobPholidoscelis desechensis (Isla Desecheo)Pholidoscelis pluvianotatus (Montserrat)
Category: All Posts Page 34 of 146
Communication is a prerequisite of human society. But when you look, smell and hear around, you rapidly realize that we are not the only ones to communicate. Indeed, plants, fungus, animals and other living things such as bacteria show extraordinary ways to “talk” to each other.
The diversity of animal signals (e.g. visual, acoustic, chemical) and their evolution has particularly fascinated biologists for decades. Etymologically, the term “communication” implies to share information between a signaler and a receiver, but the interplay between the two remains extremely challenging to study, especially in animals in their natural environment.
The use of robots in ecology is in its infancy, but promises great advances in the study of animal communication. Lizards are not outdone with this robotic revolution (see previous AA posts and several others should be forthcoming!). The use of lizard robots allows researchers to control the signal stimulus directly in the field and to address questions related to species recognition, mate choice and evolution of aggressiveness, for instance.
In a recent paper, Dave Clark and collaborators went further by designing an interactive lizard robot! Yes, the study is about Galapagos lava lizards, but it deserves great attention in the Anole Annals community as understanding the processes underlying lizard communication is of pressing interest in anole research and the interactive robot may help to understand its evolution. The authors presented a bio-mimetic conspecific robot and tested whether an immediate or a postponed 30s response of the robot to the subject’s display influenced the display latency and duration of the focal individual. They found that immediate display response by the robot to a subject’s bobbing display stimulated the focal lizard to display more rapidly and more often than when the robot’s response was delayed. These results suggest that subjects perceived a rapid response from their robotic contestant as being more aggressive than a delayed response.
This study is the first interactive robot playback experiment with lizards in natural conditions and it demonstrates that the response ‘timing of the receiver is a crucial factor of lizard communication.
Reference:
Clark, D.L., Macedonia, J.M., Rowe, J.W., Austin, M.R, Centurione, I.M, Valle, C.A. (2019). Galápagos lava lizards (Microlophus bivittatus) respond dynamically to displays from interactive conspecific robots. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73: 136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2732-6
A natural history note published September 2019 in the journal SAURIA details an unusual observation of anolivory by a Praying Mantis. Specifically, it discusses an event involving the predation of a sub-adult female Anolis (Norops) cusuco.
Anolis cusuco owes its name to its type locality in the cloud-forest of Cusuco National Park, Honduras, and is a species endemic to the country. Few publications exist regarding the natural history of this species and much regarding its ecology, including its potential predators, remain unknown. While a small contribution, this observation describes the first, albeit somewhat unsuspecting predator for Anolis cusuco.
Green anoles (Anolis carolinensis) are talked about quite frequently here on Anole Annals, with 11 articles being published in 2018 and 2019 combined! As I am sure many of you are aware, green anoles change color from green to brown, and while it is known how, it is not yet known why. Although there have been multiple field studies into what causes green anoles to change color, the data have been inconclusive. This is why an experimental study is necessary to try to determine the cause of the color change.
In this experimental study, there will be two main hypotheses tested:
The first is the well known thermoregulation hypothesis. I will be testing this by establishing separate light and heat sources, and turning them on and off for different scenarios. If anoles change color for thermoregulation, then they would turn brown more frequently when the heat is off and the light is on.
The second hypothesis is the effect of increased stress. Stress will be induced by sliding a red disk towards the anoles multiple times at a high speed. Any color change that occurs within the red disk moving and the following 10 minutes will be documented as stress-induced.
I will not be able to test the advertisement signaling hypothesis due to feasibility. Because funding and space is limited, I do not have the capacity to house male anoles, as each one needs his own setup. Therefore, testing only females is the only feasible option, and by doing so, the advertisement signaling hypothesis will not be able to be tested, as this hypothesis pertains mainly to males.
To raise funding for this project, I am using an all or nothing crowdfunding platform called Experiment. As fellow anole lovers, I hope that you can help support my scientific endeavors by visiting my project page. All forms of support are greatly appreciated, from donations, to telling your friends about the project, or even by just reading my project page and commenting your thoughts! Whatever the contribution, I am very grateful, and am simply excited to be able to share what I am doing with all of you!
If you wish to learn more about this project, you can visit the project page, “What drives the color change in green anoles?”, where I have posted my methodology, protocols, and will be posting continuous updates on the progression of the project. If you become a contributor, you will have exclusive access to more updates, and will be able to learn more about the research.
My project page stops accepting donations on November 1st at 12:00 AM PT, so be sure to make your way over to the page by then to give your support!
Thank you for taking the time to read this article. I hope that you will explore the project page, and help support this cool and unique research!
I recently received an email from Chris McMartin, the director of the Southwestern Center for Herpetological Research, about a population of brown anoles near his home in Montgomery County, Texas, just north of Houston. Chris has done a lot of preliminary research to understand how the Montgomery population is spreading, and would like to know how these lizards are related to the larger population in Harris County.
Interested? Keep reading!
With Chris’ permission, I’ve copied part of his email below:
“I’ve been casually (in my free time, mostly in the summer) researching Brown Anoles (Anolis sagrei) and their spread in southern Montgomery County where I live. As I amass observational data, I’ve noticed the lizards are abundant in some yards/neighborhoods, but nonexistent in adjacent yards/neighborhoods. I’m slowly trying to piece together additional factors (presence of outdoor cats, prevalence of certain landscaping features including decorative rocks and tropical plants, age of house/neighborhood, use of pesticides, etc.) which may explain not only the disparity in abundance but provide clues as to how to control their expansion.
One big question I have is whether the lizards are naturally expanding from a single introduction long ago (e.g. rapidly moving northward from Harris County, where they occur in densities many times higher than the highest I’ve observed in Montgomery County), or are an amalgamation of numerous discrete introductions (e.g. when a home installs new tropical plants from a nursery/home improvement store). Brown Anoles first showed up in my yard a little over a year ago, marking an expansion northward of about ¾ of a mile from my previous northernmost observations the year prior.
I have corresponded with Dr. Benson Morrill, who owns Rare Genetics Inc. offering DNA analysis for (at this time) colubrid snakes (primarily for sex determination) and inquired as to the possibility of sending him samples from various neighborhoods in my area in an effort to determine whether they represent a contiguous related population or are the result of discrete introductions. He says the process to conduct this analysis would be cost-prohibitive for a private individual such as myself, but perhaps a university student would like to take on the project.
As it is, I currently spend what surprisingly-little free time I have in the summer exploring neighborhoods in my neck of the woods and documenting my obervations—around 60 hours this past summer between field work and analysis—and I’m approaching my limit of resources in time (and definitely money, if considering DNA analysis as part of the project). This is where I think perhaps a graduate student might be interested in taking on a study of Brown Anoles as a thesis project…lots of possible threads to pull (competition with natives, rate of range expansion, effect of occasional hard freezes on population, etc.).
I’ve published articles in local magazines/newspapers about the lizards and have a public-opinion survey from a year ago (still awaiting analysis) trying to find any links between various conditions (age of neighborhood, presence of outdoor cats, etc.) and occurrence/prevalence of browns, especially with respect to A. carolinensis. Some interesting things seem to be occurring. Anecdotally, browns are eating greens (hatchlings), Broad-headed Skinks are eating browns, and greens are eating the skinks (with photographic evidence)! Sort of a three-way lacertilian arms race.”
If this sounds like just the opportunity you’ve been looking for, contact Chris at yall [at] mcmartinville.com.
Read all about it in the latest post from Daffodil’s Photo Blog.
After a bit of a hiatus, Daffodil’s Photo Blog is back with its splendid anole photos and natural history tidbits. Check out the recent offering.
From the pages of Nova.
BY KATHERINE J. WU TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2019
Compared to mammals, reptiles have a weird way of reproducing—and in the spring of 2017, that put Ashley Rasys in something of a pickle.
For months, the University of Georgia biologist was struggling to come up with a way to tinker with the genes of the brown anole (Anolis sagrei), a petite, pointy-faced lizard native to Cuba and the Bahamas.
The reptile had initially caught Rasys’ eye because of, well, its eyes. People with albinism often have poor vision due to problems with their foveae, the dense pits of cells at the back of the eyes that confer visual acuity. While foveae are lacking in most mammals, they’re present in lizards—making them intriguing candidates for studying the genes that impact foveal function.
There was just one problem: Reptiles aren’t easy to genetically manipulate. In other common laboratory animals, like mice and zebrafish, a tool called CRISPR has made DNA editing a breeze. The procedure typically involves injecting freshly fertilized eggs with gene-editing machinery, creating a change that would propagate when the cell divided.
But a few quirks ruled out that particular strategy in these lizards. Female anoles can store sperm for many months before fertilizing their eggs internally, making it difficult to time the introduction of the CRISPR cocktail. Anole fertilization also cues the formation of a soft, delicate eggshell that’s hard to penetrate without damaging the embryo.
That meant Rasys and her advisor, Doug Menke, had to get creative. So they decided to shift the injection back a developmental step, targeting eggs still maturing in the females’ ovaries. “At this point, they’re just hanging out in the lizard, waiting to be fertilized,” Rasys says.
The procedure took more than a year to perfect. But in the fall of 2018, Rasys, Menke, and the rest of their team hatched the world’s first gene-edited non-avian reptile: a red-eyed albino anole with near-transparent skin. According to the team’s study, published today in the journal Cell Reports, its birth marks a breakthrough for the field of developmental genetics, and hints that similar experiments may be possible in some of the other 10,000-plus species of non-avian reptiles that scuttle the Earth.
“This technology is really important and exciting,” says Martha Muñoz, an evolutionary biologist and anole researcher at Yale University who was not involved in the study. “This really opens up the door for other groups to think outside of traditional model organisms [like mice and zebrafish]…the sky’s the limit.”
With albinism in mind, Rasys and her colleagues set out to mutate the anoles’ tyrosinase gene, which governs pigmentation and has been linked to foveal function in humans. Manipulating this gene, Rasys explains, also made for an easy marker of success: If the procedure ended up generating albino anoles down the line, they’d be pretty tough to miss.
After rounding up 21 female brown anoles from the wilds of Orlando, Florida, the researchers gently anesthetized the lizards and opened them up. In anoles, the ovaries are transparent, making it easy to eyeball their contents “like a train of developing eggs,” Menke says.
The team selected 146 of these growing eggs and injected them with the classic CRISPR recipe: a pair of molecular scissors and a series of DNA-binding “guides” that would show them where to cut—in this case, the tyrosinase gene.
The researchers then had to wait another three months or so for the females to fertilize and lay the eggs. And even when this generation hatched, they thought there’d likely be more work to do, Rasys says. Since the CRISPR concoction had been delivered to eggs that were later fertilized by unaltered sperm, the offspring were expected to be hybrids—half edited, half unedited. These lizards then would need to be bred further to yield albinos, which must inherit the mutation from both parents for the trait to manifest.
But as Rasys watched her first clutch of gene-edited eggs grow, she noticed something strange. About a week before they were due to hatch, most of the embryos had darkened from pink to gray—an indication that they’d started producing pigment. A handful, however, retained their initial pallor, even as they continued to swell in size.
A few days later, Rasys arrived at the lab to find a newly-hatched, inch-long albino, stretching its ghostly pink legs. “It was so exciting to see it,” she recalls. “I thought, ‘It’s so cute.’”
In total, four out of the team’s 146 CRISPR-injected embryos were obvious albinos, surprising the entire team. There’s no way to know exactly what happened, but Menke’s leading theory is that the CRISPR components remained active in some of the eggs long enough to work their magic on both the maternal and paternal copies of the tyrosinasegene.
Genetic screening revealed another five embryos to be the half-edited hybrids the team had initially expected. And when the researchers partnered one of these CRISPR mutts with an unmanipulated mate, the mutation was passed on to some of the pair’s offspring, suggesting the edited gene was heritable.
There’s still plenty of tinkering to do, Menke says. As they report in the study, the team’s gene-editing success rate was around 6 percent—a figure that pales in comparison to the near-perfect efficiency rates that have been reported in zebrafish and mice.
But just showing gene-editing is possible in this system is a big deal, says Ambika Kamath, a behavioral ecologist at the University of California, Berkeley who was not involved in the study. Albinism implications aside, anoles have long been studied by evolutionary biologists and ecologists. In their native Caribbean, the lizards have split into many lineages, but understanding this diversification “has primarily been a historical science…involving stitching together patterns that happened a long time ago,” Muñoz says. “By extending CRISPR to Anolis, we can now mechanistically test some [evolutionary] hypotheses.”
As more applications surface, however, “we don’t want to be releasing CRISPRed lizards into the wild willy-nilly,” Kamath says, without a better understanding of how these sorts of introductions would affect the population at large.
And it might be more than lizard lives at stake. Menke thinks the team’s technique is likely to work in a variety of reptiles, many of which share the anole’s mode of reproduction. There’s even the possibility, he says, that the method could be adapted for birds, which are cut from the same evolutionary cloth. Scientists have hatched CRISPant chicks in the past, but as in lizards, bird embryos are hard to pinpoint at the single-cell stage, making current editing procedures complex and laborious.
Carolyn Neuhaus, a bioethicist at the Hastings Center who was not involved in the study, cautions that as CRISPR continues to be debuted in more and more organisms, the how, when, and in whom of gene editing will need to remain transparent. Though many experiments—including the ones in this study—have the potential to advance science and human health, she says, technology like this shouldn’t be used in a new species “just because it’s there.”
“We rely on scientists to create accurate and reliable knowledge, and that’s a huge responsibility,” she says. “With the CRISPR craze…I just hope it happens as mindfully and carefully as possible.”
When I first encountered Anolis baleatus, this Hispaniolan crown-giant was mostly an inconvenience. At the time I was gathering data for my doctoral thesis by cycling preserved anoles through a µCT-scanner. Most of the adult specimens of A. baleatus were just too large to easily fit into the scan chamber, so it took a lot of patience and creativity to acquire any decent images of the appendicular girdles, which are the body parts I was interested in.
During that process I also acquired radiographic images of the head skeleton, and found unusual patterns of crenulation in this species. The cranium of Anolis baleatus displays a great degree of seemingly asymmetrical (or at least somewhat irregular) ornamentation across its dorsal surface. This is especially pronounced on the prefrontal and frontal bones, and completely obscures all superficial distinction between them in adult lizards. In adults, cranial ornamentation is also borne by the paired nasals, maxillae, and postorbitals, and the parietal (see figure).
Both Steven Poe (1998) and Susan Evans (2008) mentioned this ossified garnish, but a thorough account of their variation among anoles remains absent from the primary literature. Richard Etheridge and Kevin de Queiroz (1988) were probably the first to report on skull ornaments in anoles (as part of a discussion of several iguanian lizards with similar cranial adornments), and remarked that the distribution patterns of dermal rugae may reflect those of the topographically associated epidermal scales.
Overall, this ornamentation appears to be relatively uncommon among anoles, especially to the degree expressed in Anolis baleatus (and several other crown-giant ecomorph anoles). Considering the osteologically robust appearance of crown-giants, even at early stages of ontogenetic development, this gives rise to questions regarding the development of these ornamental patterns. Thanks to the collection efforts of Luke Mahler (University of Toronto), and a postdoctoral position in his lab, I was able to acquire CT-image data representing an ontogenetic series of this species, ranging from very young juveniles to skeletally mature adults.
While parts of the paired frontals of juveniles are covered in modest eminences, prominent cranial ornamentation is absent from small specimens (see figure). Likely, growth of these ornaments begins very late during ontogenetic development. Ornaments on the prefrontals and parietal are only evident in specimens that, to the best of our judgement, are approaching sexual maturity. We looked at fifteen specimens per sex, representing a range of juvenile and subadult sizes, and this general pattern is consistent throughout the image data. Schwartz (1974) inferred that anoles in the ricordii group reach sexual maturity between 100 and 110 mm snout-vent length (SVL), and we observed the first prominent ornaments at sizes between 90 and 95 mm SVL. Assuming that differences in size directly represent ontogenetic growth, these findings imply that Anolis baleatus starts to grow elaborate ornamentation as it approaches sexual maturity, and that expansion and growth of these ornaments then continues into skeletal maturity. Interestingly, both males and females appear to develop them at roughly the same body size.
The function and evolutionary cause of these structures remain unknown, and these are questions we are currently investigating. Body size is an important correlate for the occurrence of cranial ornaments, but these structures may also conceivably play roles in defense, feeding, or intraspecific agonistic interactions. Stay tuned!
Videos
References
Etheridge, R. & de Queiroz, K. (1988): A phylogeny of Iguanidae.─ [In:] Estes, R.D. & Pregill, G.K. (eds.): Phylogenetic Relationships of the Lizard Families: Essays Commemorating Charles L Camp, 283-367; Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Evans, S. (2008): The skull of lizards and tuatara.─ [In:] Gans, C., Gaunt, A.S. & Adler, K. (eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 20:1-347; Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Ithaca, New York.
Poe, S. (1998): Skull characters and the cladistic relationships of the Hispaniolan dwarf twig Anolis.─ Herpetological Monographs, 12:192-236; The Herpetologists’ League.
Schwartz, A. (1974): An analysis of variation in the Hispaniolan giant anole, Anolis ricordi Dumeril and Bibron.─ Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 146:89-146.