Author: Anna Thonis

I am an ecologist and conservation biologist focused on anole lizards, primarily the anoles of Puerto Rico.

Hurricanes Shape Puerto Rican Anole Distributions

The Caribbean’s history of tropical cyclones (e.g., hurricanes, tropical storms, tropical depressions) is well-known, and a number of studies have quantified how anole populations differ before and after a storm. Previous studies have recorded changes in anole phenotype, behavior, and population density following a tropical cyclone. That said, these are almost always opportunistic studies in which researchers collected data on anoles at a given site, a tropical cyclone impacted the area in which the data were collected, and then the researchers subsequently returned to the study site to collect the same type of data, this time post-storm. From these important studies, it is clear that tropical cyclones can have a near-immediate impact on anole populations, but what about over the long-term?

Tropical cyclones track passing within 500 km of Puerto Rico since 1955.

To understand if tropical cyclones have played a role in shaping the present-day distributions of anoles, we used random forests to individually model the distributions of all ten Puerto Rican anole species with and without data from the National Hurricane Center (NHC). Using the NHC data, we quantified variables related to tropical cyclone intensity (e.g., storm category, wind speed) and frequency (e.g., the number of tropical cyclones an individual anole experienced in a one-year window) to be used in species distribution models. Our results indicate that incorporating data on tropical cyclone intensity and frequency into species distribution models improves model predictive performance for nearly all ten Puerto Rican anole species. Additionally, the wind speed variable was identified as potentially important in shaping present-day species distribution patterns, particularly for A. cristatellus, A. krugi, A. pulchellus, and A. stratulus.

Linear regression of AUCtest with and without tropical cyclone variables for each of Puerto Rico’s anole species. AUCtest is a common metric used to assess species distribution models, with values closer to 1 indicative of more predictive models. The dashed red line follows y=x, where any values along that line indicate no change in model performance between models with and without tropical cyclone variables.

Although species distribution models can tell us which environmental variables are potentially important in shaping species distributions, they are limited in that they cannot tell us if there are underlying mechanisms shaping those spatial patterns. For example, hurricane wind speed is a potentially important variable in shaping anole distributions, but how? According to the wind speed response curve, it appears that anole habitat suitability (sometimes also referred to as “probability of presence”) decreases as wind speed increases… but why? I do not think anoles are getting ripped from the trees by powerful winds at a rate such that wind speeds are shaping anole distributions. Rather, it is more likely (and supported by other studies of how hurricanes impact wildlife) that tropical cyclones are shaping anole microhabitat and microclimate over long periods of time and thereby indirectly shaping anole distributions. More work is needed to understand how hurricanes shape anole distributions, but we believe this work is a step in the right direction.

You can read the full article here. If you don’t have access, please email me at anna.thonis@stonybrook.edu or anna.thonis8@gmail.com and I will happily send you a PDF copy.

Re-establishing the IUCN SSC Anole Specialist Group

In Fall 2011, the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Species Survival Commission (SSC) Anoline Lizard Specialist Group (ALSG) was approved. The group had a good run for several years before entering a period of inactivity. At present, all IUCN activity pertaining to anoles goes through the IUCN Snake and Lizard Red List Authority, rather than an anole-specific IUCN Specialist Group.

Luke Mahler said it well back in his 2012 Anole Annals post:

Anoles are well-known for a lot of reasons, but conservation is not one of them.

Unfortunately – and despite the deep appreciation and fascination many of us have with anoles – anole conservation still seems to be on the backburner. This does not stem from a lack of caring, but rather from a lack of time. With over 380 anole species described, the lack of an Anoline Lizard SG gives the impression that anole biologists do not care about their conservation. I know this is not true and I am therefore in the process of gauging interest in re-establishing an IUCN SSC Specialist Group that would develop conservation, science, and outreach activities to facilitate the survival of wild anoles in their natural habitats.

Please fill out this short Google form if you have any interest in helping re-establish the IUCN SSC Anoline Lizard Specialist Group.

I would like to underscore that when the ALSG was active, anole biologists contributed to many anole Red List assessments and other important conservation actions for numerous anole species. This was a major improvement compared to what little had been done for anole conservation prior to the establishment of the ALSG. The initial establishment of the ALSG was a huge step in the right direction, but we have to keep going. There remains plenty of action to be taken to conserve anoles, particularly anoles that are comparatively understudied, occur at low densities, have small or restricted distributions, or are actively facing habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation (and more). Re-establishing the IUCN SSC ALSG will give us a platform through which to build an anole conservation network as we work to improve anole conservation efforts globally.

I would also like to emphasize that our work will not stop at simply re-establishing the SG. We will need to develop goals and objectives for the group and find ways to reach these goals – all in an effort to promote and improve anole conservation. As you all know, there are a lot of anoles species and therefore, we need a lot of people on board!

Please feel free to reach out to me at anna.thonis@stonybrook.edu with any questions you may have.

I am hopeful and excited to talk with many of you about how we can develop a thriving and active ALSG in the near future!

All the best,

Anna Thonis

Distribution Models for Puerto Rican Anoles under Predicted Climate Change

SDMs for (A) A. cooki, (B) A. cristatellus, (C) A. evermanni, and (D) A. gundlachi. Left images are current suitable habitat. Right images are predicted suitable habitat in 2070 under HadGEM2-AO RCP8.5. The warmer the color (the redder it is), the more suitable the habitat.

Species Distribution Models (SDMs), although relatively new compared to other ecological methods, have been built for a wide range of taxa over a variety of habitat types and regions of the world. Given their widespread use, it was surprising to Brad Lister and me that there were very few SDMs for anoles, and in particular, none for Puerto Rican anoles. Brad and I decided to model the potential suitable habitat for all ten Puerto Rican Anolis species under various climatic scenarios for the years 2050 and 2070. The results of our study showed declines in suitable habitat for nearly all ten mainland Puerto Rican anoles with the exception of Anolis cooki. Declines in suitable habitat have the potential to substantially increase extinction risks for anoles. Although this study focused on Puerto Rican anoles, it is plausible that similar climate change impacts could be seen throughout the West Indies.

Species Distribution Modeling is a rapidly developing subfield of ecology, but we found a paucity of useful information that linked all the steps together. I am now working on a step-by-step tutorial that will fill in a lot of missing information on the steps that many tutorials breeze past. For me, an important component of creating SDMs was using software with the greatest potential for widespread use and method replication. For instance, ArcGIS is exceptionally powerful, but comes with steep licensing fees. For that reason, we opted to use comparable, open-source packages QGIS and DIVA-GIS. With respect to the actual modeling software, MaxEnt is a great option with no associated cost. Additionally, although we did not use it for this paper, Wallace is a very useful platform that incorporates different algorithms (including MaxEnt) for creating SDMs in a user-friendly series of guided steps.


As a part of my doctoral research in the Akcakaya Lab at Stony Brook University, I intend to build more accurate SDMs for Puerto Rican anoles by incorporating biotic interactions and more relevant predictor variables. I am also interested in working on SDMs that output multi-species range shifts given forecasts of future climate change. With these initiatives in mind, I anticipate reporting on new developments in Anolis SDMs in the near future. In general, the study of Anolis SDMs is just beginning and many important research directions remain to be explored. As we expand the use of SDMs I think it’s useful to keep George Box’s quote in mind: “All models are wrong, but some are useful.” It’s an informative mindset to have when building and interpreting any SDM. Although they can be helpful in conservation decision making, their results are just predictions based on more predictions and we need to keep asking ourselves how those predictions can be improved.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén