Evolution 2016: Ecomorphology in Caribbean Eleutherodactylus Frogs

Common_CoquíStephen Jay Gould famously claimed that evolution is “utterly unpredictable and quite unrepeatable,” and we Anolis biologists have relished in proving that statement wrong. In his talk in Austin this week, Alejandro Gonzalez Voyer of UNAM (with coauthors Alvaro Dugo Cota and Carles Vilá) showed that anoles aren’t the only Caribbean herps to exhibit the independent, repeated evolution of ecomorphs across islands – Eleuthrodactylus frogs have joined the club!

Among the remarkably diverse Caribbean Eleuthrodactylus species, nine ecotypes exist, including terrestrial, leaf-litter, aquatic, riparian, bromelicolous, arboreal, fossorial, cavernicolous, and petricolous specialists. Gonzalez and his coauthors first determined that these ecotypes evolved repeatedly, and showed that their distribution resulted from both invasion across islands and intra-island speciation. They also found that eight of the nine ecotypes cluster in morphological space and exhibit significant convergence. (The ninth, the fossorial ecotype, is composed of a monophyletic clade from Hispaniola and so convergence could not be tested.)

In sum, it appears that Eleutrodactylus ecotypes are indeed ecomorphs, and that evolution may be utterly predictable and quite repeatable after all.

Previous

Evolution 2016: Niche and Morphological Evolution in a Phylogenetic Context in Liolaemus

Next

Evolution 2016: Using Anoles to Understand Shifts in Forests

2 Comments

  1. I think we both noticed and documented this back in the ’50s. Didn’t EEWilliams or Stan Rand, or both, publish on this? Skip

  2. Miguel Landestoy

    Interesting! It is good to see that the Caribbean terraranans are back as a study model for island radiations and ecomorphological convergence. I read about this as for the first time (for Eleutherodactylus) from Hedges (1989): http://www.hedgeslab.org/pubs/18.pdf; http://www.hedgeslab.org/pubs/19.pdf

    The clade (Pelorius) that include Hispaniolan fossorial frogs have some ingroup diversity, some being able to excavate (ruthae Series), and some not (inoptatus Series), involving both terrestrial (surface) and arboreal life; so maybe the latter could still be tested, at least partially?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén