Creationists on Lizard Evolution Study: “What’s the Big Deal?”

discovery institute

Last week, Yoel Stuart and colleagues (including me) published a paper demonstrating that green anoles had rapidly (ca. 20 years) evolved an increase in toepad size as a result of upward shifts in habitat use caused the presence of brown anoles.

The Discovery Institute, an organization devoted to the advocacy of creationist views, posted a blog yesterday saying, basically, “this is not news?” After summarizing the study, here’s what they have to say:

“….these scientists found that when a new species of lizards invaded another’s territory (in fact the new species was placed there intentionally by the researchers, meaning they weren’t quite studying “natural” selection), the old one sought higher ground. That seems like a smart thing to do. To go along with the new territory, they subsequently evolved “larger toepads (see here for a picture).

After reading this, what I really wanted to see was the precise sizes of the toepad and compare the changes. But alas that information is not in the paper. I tried downloading the supplemental materials but it’s not there either. So let’s assume that the toepad size changed a lot. What have we shown?

Not much. We’ve seen that the size of lizard feet can change in response to invaders’ driving a species to perch at higher levels in the trees. No new traits arose. Only the size of a pre-existing trait changed. Again, that’s interesting but such changes in the size of lizard feet do very little to explain the origin of lizards in the first place, even if these changes happen in just a few generations.

If we take seriously the statement from the authors that the modest results from this study can help test “evolutionary hypotheses about phenomena … on time scales too long for direct observation,” then that implies that over long periods you might be able to change the size of an organism or some of its body parts. Since when is that news?”

Jonathan Losos
Latest posts by Jonathan Losos (see all)

Previous

The Blue-Dewlapped Anole of Grand Cayman

Next

Battle of the Lilliputian Brown Anoles

4 Comments

  1. Right: evolution is not “news.” It has been going on for millions of years. Now, Creation would be really different!

  2. This work also got coverage recently on Gawker , an accomplishment few other anolologist can claim!

  3. I’m both a believer in a necessary, creating God and I think evolution is a reasonable theory. Or, put in another way, I believe in a God who can create through evolution.

    No big deal.

    People on both sides who think the two things are mutually exclusive often misunderstand each other and, in order to prove their stance, say really dumb things.

    Padre Alejandro

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén