Chamaeleolis, the un-anole anole. Does this evolutionary one-off demonstrate that island anole radiations are not convergent? Photo by Veronika Holanova and more on this snail crunching anole in a previous post.
Stephen Jay Gould famously proclaimed that if the tape of life were rewound and played again, a different evolutionary outcome would result. He argued that chances events–a lightning strike, a particular mutation–would send evolution careening down a different path. Gould’s idea has been controversial and provocative, but also untestable beyond the confines of the laboratory (you actually can replay the tape of life with microbes, but that’s another story).
The next closest possibility is to look at closely related species evolving in similar environmental settings. These “natural experiments” are in some ways a test of Gould’s hypothesis–will evolution from a similar starting point, in similar environments, unfold in similar ways? Gould would have said no, but what do the lizards say?
The evolutionary radiations of Anolis lizards on the islands of the Greater Antilles are renowned for their convergence, with the same set of “ecomorphs” (i.e., habitat specialists) evolving repeatedly on each island. The existence of the ecomorphs would seem to indicate that, in fact, evolution is deterministic–put an ancestral anole on a Caribbean island and let it evolve, and you get the same ecomorphs each time. But there’s a catch, two of them, actually. First, not all ecomorphs occur on all four Greater Antillean islands. Grass-bush anoles are missing from Jamaica and trunk anoles from both Jamaica and Puerto Rico. Moreover, second, there are some habitat specialists that are unique to a single island, with no ecomorphological counterpart on the other islands. The leaf-litter dwelling Anolis (Chamaelinorops) barbouri from Hispaniola or the Chamaeleolis clade–snail-crunching chameleon döppelgangers–from Cuba, pictured above. These quite distinctive habitat specialists–and a number of others–are evolutionary one-offs, with no convergent counterparts elsewhere.
So, convergence isn’t complete across the Greater Antilles. And that raises the question of whether the island radiations are actually replicated or not. Sure, there are some particular instances of convergence, but it’s always possible that these are instances embedded in a larger sea of non-convergence. Is island radiation truly deterministic? Are the evolutionary outcomes on the four islands actually more similar than one might expect by chance?
Average distance of species to their nearest neighbor on another island (gray line) is considerably less than would be expected by chance (gray blocks representing the results of many simulation trials; see papers for details on how these simulations were conducted).
A paper just published by Luke Mahler et al. in Science asks exactly that question (disclosure: I’m one of the authors). The paper took two approaches, using data on the morphology of each species (e.g., limb length, head length, number of toepad scales). First, the morphological similarity of each species to all others was quantified, based on these measurements. In this way, the morphological distance (in a statistical sense) to the nearest species on another island could be calculated. We then asked whether species had a nearest neighbor on another island that was closer (more similar) than would be expected by chance. The result is clear, and illustrated by the figure above. The average distance to nearest neighbor is much smaller than expected by chance. In other words, species tend to have convergent counterparts on other islands.
The number of convergent shifts to the same adaptive peak is substantially greater than expected by chance.
The second approach used a new method developed by Travis Ingram and Luke Mahler which estimates the underlying macroevolutionary landscape. To make a long story short, based on phylogenetic relationships of species and their morphology, the method identifies the minimum number of adaptive peaks across all islands. Convergent evolution would be indicated by unrelated species evolving to occupy the same peaks. The results indicate that there is far more convergence than expected by chance. This result indicates that the underlying macroevolutionary landscape on the islands is similar on the four islands, thus driving evolutionary diversification to occur in similar ways. The idea of the macroevolutionary landscape traces back to famed paleontologist George Gaylord Simpson, and this study is perhaps the first to explicitly test the idea that similarity in the macroevolutionary landscape is what leads to replicated adaptive radiations.
So, Gould seems to have gotten it wrong–let anoles diversify in similar settings, and the outcome will be very similar. Not identical–perhaps revealing the importance of his so-beloved historical contingencies–but pretty darn close, much more so than one would expect by chance. Now, in Gould’s defense, there is reason to believe (because he once told a reporter so) that he didn’t mean his tape rewinding metaphor to apply to the minor dabblings of insignificant little lizards; rather,he was concerned about grand patterns, deep in evolutionary time, when evolution was much less constrained and life was still exploring vast horizons and testing its limits.
Regardless, there is one last Gouldian twist. Anoles have been diversifying on these islands for tens of millions of years. So, the fact that the placement of the adaptive peaks is so similar suggests that there is a long-term stability to the macroevolutionary landscape. Such a long term arrangement would lead to lack of evolutionary change. As we all know, evolutionary stasis was another of Gould’s favorite ideas, so it would seem that SJG went one-for-two with anoles, a .500 average good enough for the all-star team in many leagues.
If you want to more on this paper, there’s a nice article/interview of Luke Mahler by Ed Yong on the Phenomena: Not Exactly Rocket Science website.
- Diet Notes on Beautiful Blue Knight Anole - September 4, 2024
- Anoles Provide Ecosystem Services - September 2, 2024
- Mississippi Kite Eats Green Anole - August 6, 2024
James (Skip) Lazell
Great! I had many wonderful professors during my academic life, but G.G. Simpson was the best!
Kevin de Queiroz
Cool study! However, I’m not sure that Gould would have considered this evidence to contradict his proposition about replaying the tape. He probably would have said that the same species would not evolve, but I’m not sure he would have said that the same ecomorphs would not. Consider the larger scale of all life. The kinds of things that Gould claims would not evolve are specific taxa (vertebrates, humans) and specific traits (self-conscious intelligence). But he doesn’t seem to deny the repeated evolution of more general categories such as autotrophs and heterotrophs, or multicellular organisms (though he argues that it might take substantially more or less time for them to evolve). How much replication is expected depends on the starting point (all life versus the last common ancestor of extant anoles).
Luke Mahler
Thanks Kevin. And thanks for your thoughts on Gould. I gave this issue a good bit of thought as I was putting together an early draft, and did a lot of rereading of Gould. Gould’s views on contingency have sometimes been defended as pertaining to the origins and early evolution of major ways of life, but perhaps not to later or more minor evolutionary sequences (e.g., recent philosophy of science work by Russell Powell), but Gould himself wasn’t shy about extending the argument to apply more broadly. Gould began Wonderful Life with an extensive treatment of the Cambrian Explosion, which was the core of his story, but he spent much of the latter half of the book applying the same arguments to the rest of the history of life, proposing contingency as a dominant macroevolutionary principle. For example, he argues in later chapters that chance has shaped evolutionary outcomes in both mammals and predatory birds during the Cenozoic, which is also when anoles were radiating. It’s too bad Gould is no longer around, as I would have loved to have asked him about it. My sense is that if Gould didn’t have knowledge of the anole system (which he obviously did, as he was just down the hall from Ernest Williams), and he were asked to outline his expectations for anole diversification on these islands, he would have bet on a less matching than we actually see, and I also suspect he would have envisioned a more minor role for adaptation than we’ve proposed.